Thursday, 13 September 2012

Two Wisdoms

-->(August 2012: "Epistle of James"_Exegesis Paper from James 3: 13-18)


I.                   INTRODUCTION
The congregation that James addresses to is noted as “the twelve tribes scattered among the nations”, which recognized by Douglas J. Moo as “the true people of God of the last days”[1]. These are people who come into the faith in Christ Jesus and who are dispersed over worldwide areas. Kurt A. Richardson believes that these people denote to both Jewish and Gentile believers. Or they are addressed so because of the diversity of the Gentile origins and identities found in the church presented in the letter of James[2].
The congregation is disrupted by those teachers who position themselves to be above others in terms of their wisdom and teachings. Yet what they have taken pride in resulted in fights and quarrels (James 4:1). They are teachers who suppose to speak the truth and live the truth so that the people of God could imitate them, but their lives and words are controversial and in conflicts and they have indeed created disorders and all kinds of evil practices among the people (James 3: 16). Their uncontrolled tongues have spread like forest fire and brought contamination and damages upon the lives of those who hear and practice their teachings. The believing community is in the state of disunity because of the “wise” teachings they received.
It is under this setting that James writes these verses found in James 3:13-18, (with 3:1-12 deals with ungodly speech of the false teachers who claimed to be wise, and 4:1-6 deals with negative consequences of those who have uncontrolled tongues and speech) revealing what is of true wisdom and exposing what is of false wisdom, exhorting the false teachers to not misuse their tongues but instead develop authentic Christian virtues[3], and challenge the congregation to pursue and live up those commendable virtues produced by true wisdom that comes from God.   
II.                TRUE WISDOM VERSUS FALSE WISDOM
(James 3:13 NIV) Who is wise and understanding among you? Let them show it by their good life, by deeds done in the humility that comes from wisdom.
James starts his argument between two wisdoms with a contrasting challenge, issuing an ironic question, “Who is wise (sophos, σοφός) and understanding (Greek: epistēmōn, ἐπιστήμων, denotes philosophical understandings) among you?” followed by stating a conclusive statement, “Let them show it by their good life, by deeds done in the humility that comes from wisdom.” The false teachers thought that they are “wise” and understanding, yet their wisdom is only abstract concepts and theories. Speech is useless unless it is accompanied by proven lifestyle. James makes it very clear that wisdom is personified and qualified with good life and humble deeds.  
 Bible has its say about wisdom. Wisdom is a favorite term used by many biblical writers, and indeed some of the books in the Bible are classified as Wisdom Literature. It is true enough to see from Scriptural perspectives and evidences that wisdom is a practical way of life and living rather than a conceptual or an intellectual idea and understanding. It is indeed a concrete process of discerning the will of God, followed by intentional translation of those understandings one has gained through the Word, into actual daily living and encounters in order to attain abundance and fullness of the grace of God. For the author James, wisdom is certainly to be weighed and envisioned through Christian living, which emphasizes both upon the “word” (the tongue, the speech) and “work” (the attitudes, the behaviors) of those believers he addresses to[4].
James makes some striking contrasts between the heavenly wisdom and the earthly wisdom, by a further elaboration and classification of their sources, their characteristics and their behavioral results:
1.      SOURCES OF WISDOMS
Sources determine the natures, and the ultimate consequences or outcome of those natures. True wisdom derives from above while false wisdom derives from below. James sees true wisdom is heavenly in nature while false wisdom is men’s mere words and philosophical talks, with corrupted fleshy desires and agenda. His perspectives are very much resembled with what Paul shares to Corinthians. Paul concludes in 1 Corinthians 1:24 that Christ is power and the wisdom of God, which outweighs the worldly wisest of all.
1.1  TRUE WISDOM
 (James 3:17NIV) But the wisdom that comes from heaven is first of all…
True wisdom depicted by James implying a heavenly vision, strikingly marked by humility accompanying with good deeds birthed through a good life (NIV as “way of life” or “mode of life”). The Jewish traditions, either of wisdom literatures[5] or revelatory literatures[6] agree and uphold that true wisdom always comes from above and it is a gift from God rather than attainment of men.
E.g., Solomon received his wisdom from God upon his request made to God and he became the wisest man who ever lived on earth. The Bible does emphasize that wisdom comes from knowing and fearing God and it will definitely bring impacts upon the moral, ethical and spiritual aspects of those who choose to follow and honor Him. The interpretations of Jewish commentaries highlight a very close and inter-woven relationship between wisdom and studying, understanding and practicing of Torah, which serves to be the commandments of God, who is the source of all and true wisdom.
Application
Since wisdom comes from God, there is no where we can gain or increase our wisdom unless we turn to the source, the Almighty God. James teaches us to ask wisdom if we lack of it (James 1:-5). Wisdom is not accumulated through acquisition of knowledge but instead a gift from God we receive when we ask of Him and learn of Him. If we cultivated an attitude of fearing and horning God, and do not deviate from His path, and to observe all His instructive words we are indeed considered as wise and possess true wisdom.
1.2  FALSE WISDOM
(James 3:15NIV) Such “wisdom” does not come down from heaven, but is earthly, unspiritual, demonic.
In verse 15, James uses three adjectives to picture those natures of wisdom that comes from below, that it is earthly, unspiritual and demonic. It is birthed through human’s reasons and rational mind, with selfish desires and pursues, reaping fleshy and unwholesome behavioral consequences. The source is of earth and from earth, derives from the sinful nature of human beings and seeks to gratify their flesh rather than wanting to please God.
Paul in 1 Corinthians 1: 17-25 mentions about worldly wisdom and godly wisdom and he issues a challenge towards those who rely on the wisdom of this world, rendering them foolish indeed in the eyes of God, as fools despise God and deny the godly wisdom and truth found in the Cross.
a)      Earthly
The Greek word “epigeios” (ἐπίγειος) appears twice in the New Testament, which is in James 3:15, and 2 Corinthians 5:1 where Paul refers to an earthly tent we live in. epigeios” indicates an earthbound state, which conveys a negative role of image of the world. According to David P. Nystrom, earthly is defined as less pure and inferior, referring to forces arrayed against God[7]. Moo links it with “epigeia”(ἐπίγεια) used in Philippians 3:19 describing earthly things which are transitory, weak and imperfect[8]. This is a “wisdom” that derives from human philosophical understanding without any essence of God[9].  
b)      Unspiritual
This type of unspiritual wisdom is also known to be sensual (KJV) and natural (INT & NAS). The Greek word “psychikē”(ψυχική) comes from “psuke” which means “life” or “soul”[10]. The ancient people perceived a complete human body to be comprised of three components, which are spirit(pneuma), soul(psuche) and body(soma). The “psucheis the common part shared by human and animals whereas “pneuma” is the portion that separates human beings from animals. William Barclay concludes that James seems to refer this type of wisdom as of bestial nature which makes only belly their god[11]. It belongs to our “old men” with unconverted nature and stimulated only by fleshy senses[12], and allows human reasons and feelings to reign in supreme[13]. It is “soulish” and Jude sees this as man without God’s Spirit or man who does not receive things that come from the Spirit of God[14].
c)      Demonic
The Greek word “daimoniōdēs” (δαιμονιώδης) is translated either as demonic, of devil or devilish. This type of demonic wisdom creates forces which go against the will of God and causes division among His people[15]. It is by nature hypocritical, selfish and destructive[16].
Application
There are channels considered by people of this world as ways of obtaining wisdom. Some gain “wisdom” by knowledge piling and utilizing the accumulated knowledge for their own benefits or achievements. Some devote their lives in philosophical training and perceive that learning from the wise will make them wiser. Yet their learning ultimately will lead them no way but emptiness and frustration.
In most of our culture, we have high regard for those older men and women who have gone through life experiences enough to be our instructors and counselors, giving us wise advices towards life circumstances. Sometime it proves to be working but sometimes it just does not make sense, as we are created by God uniquely and He deals with us individually and specifically.
Fear God and shun evil is the advice from the wise (Proverbs 3:7). The Bible tells us not to consider ourselves wise in our own eyes, for we are fallen in our nature, and our mind is corrupted too. The sources of false wisdom warn us of the danger of destruction if we rely on our own understanding and percepts. Therefore we need to deny ourselves and allow God to renew and transform our mind with His truth.    
2.      CHARACTERISTICS OF WISDOMS
There was this Egyptian King who asked his high priest to present two items of sacrifices with one representing the best and the other representing the worst of an animal. The high priest offered a tongue of the animal as sacrifice, and said to the King, “The tongue is the best part of this animal, as it speaks words of comfort and love. But it is the worst, for it brings forth hatred and humiliation.”[17] The “wisdom” according to James, has its best when it derives from God with godly characters, and has its worst when it derives from the earth, the flesh and the devil with corruptive natures:
2.1    TRUE WISDOM
(James 3:13NIV) Who is wise and understanding among you? Let them show it by their good life, by deeds done in the humility that comes from wisdom.
(James 3:17 NIV) But the wisdom that comes from heaven is first of all pure; then peace-loving, considerate, submissive, full of mercy and good fruit, impartial and sincere.
As stated in verse 13, it is understood that the wisdom which “showed by one’s good (Greek: kalēs, καλῆς, means “sound” also in 1Timothy 4:6) life (Geek: anastrophēs, ἀναστροφῆς, translated as way of life or conduct by INT; conduct or behavior by NAS; and conversation b KJV)” (James 3:13a) relates with one’s proper outward behaviors or speech, and the “humility (Greek: “prautēti”, πραΰτητι, translated as meekness by KJV, and gentleness by NAS) comes from wisdom (or “of wisdom”; Greek: sophias, σοφίας)” (James 3:13b) relates with one’s godly inner attitude or character trait.
Wisdom from above brings unity within a person as well as among the community he lives and relates with. It is consistently demonstrated through one’s godly character with acts of piety. It is a wisdom that produces good fruits. Richardson sees wisdom as “it knows the good and knows how to do the good”[18].
These are seven positive and godly characteristics listed by James in verse 17 which should be found within a man if one claims to possess true wisdom, of which the number “seven” signifies “completeness” in Jewish numerical concept:
a)      Purity
The Greek word is “hagnē” (ἁγνή) carries with it an idea of “chaste, free from defilement”. Warren W. Wiersbe asserts that spiritual purity yields a chaste relationship with the Lord.[19] The Jewish purity ritual does require one to cleanse himself before performing any spiritual rituals and activities. Purity qualifies one to stand before God.
b)      Peace-Loving
The Greek word is “eirēnikē”(εἰρηνική) known as peaceable in NAS, KJV and NIT. The biblical idea of peace is first of all peace with God, and then peace with men. One can enjoy peace if one could relate right with God and with men around him. Nystrom says that “peace” is a state of truth, honesty, righteousness and justice that is created and maintained[20].
c)      Considerate
The Greek word is “epieikēs (ἐπιεικής), with NASB, KJV and NIT translate as “gentle”. It is usually associated with justice, and the administration of justice, carrying with it an idea that the position of the power is not abused, instead it is preserved as calm and sober and true to its highest ideals[21]. William Barclay describes wisdom serving as a way superseding those stipulated laws as it allow the wise to apprehend and exercise his authority to balance off justice and mercy.[22]  
This godly characteristic is used in Paul’s instructions towards Timothy (1Timothy 3:3) as one of the positive temperaments that an overseer or elder shall possess, and his advices towards Titus (3:2) and the church in Philippi (Philippians 4:5) as a quality of lifestyle for those who live in the truth.   
d)      Submissive
The Greek word is “eupeithēs” (εὐπειθής) which can either means “trusting” or “easily persuaded”. It shows that a sober, thinking and intuitive person who voluntarily and willingly receives the truth upon hearing it.[23]
e)      Full of mercy and good fruit
In Greek, the word for mercy is “eleous” (ἐλέους), and the word for fruit is “karpōn” (καρπῶν, NAS translates sometimes as the produce or the harvest). Mercy means originally as sympathy showed towards an innocent man who is unnecessarily accused and judged. Christians extends its usage as sympathy towards the outcasts and the poor, with actual charity works rendered to meet their needs[24].
f)        Impartial
The Greek word is adiakritos (ἀδιάκριτος, NAS translates as unwavering), indicating one who is firm and sound in his thought, and not succumbed to any circumstances. An impartial person will not be wavered by others but choose to do what is right in the eyes of God.  
g)      Sincere
The Greek word is “anypokritos” (ἀνυπόκριτος, KJV translates as without hypocrisy or without dissimulation). To be sincere is to be true, to be consistent both in the inner and outer man.
Application
The characteristics laid down by James are measurements which we could use to evaluate ourselves if we truly are wise in God. If we consider ourselves wise, our lives should have these character traits demonstrated. We shall keep ourselves pure and not allow any sins to pollute us or separate us from the presence of God. We shall act as peacemakers who draw ourselves nearer to God and to men. We will disallow any discords found in our midst that hinder development of brotherly or sisterly love. We shall have sound judgment and not legalistic in executing judgments towards others. We shall trust ourselves unto the hands of God, leaning on His leading and guidance. We shall devote ourselves in social good works enhancing the welfares of others. We shall hold on to the truth and keep doing what is right in the eyes of God. We shall be consistent and not live a double lifestyle.
True wisdom is fulfilling the Great Commission through obeying the Great Commandment. It is shown in our love towards God and towards others, and willing to give up our “human” rights or comfort so that others could live better or know God deeper. 
2.2    FALSE WISDOM
(James 3:14 NIV) But if you harbor bitter envy and selfish ambition in your hearts, do not boast about it or deny the truth.
James marks the characteristics of false wisdom known as bitter envy and self ambition. The false teachers promote themselves as “spiritual elites” who are qualified to teach and who presume their authority as teachers of God’s Word. Yet their very motives are driven by competitive and personal agenda which stands in contrast to what God requires of the teachers of His word, those who will teach out of love and reverence towards God and His truth. The false teachers’ intention is marred and corrupted, and what come out from them will be indeed dead and lifeless!
a.       Bitter Envy
The Greek word for bitter is “pikron” (πικρόν). The Greek word for envy is “zēlon (ζῆλον, NAS & INT translates as jealousy), derives from “zelos” translated as zeal. relates it as “the noble emulation which a man feels when he is confronted with some picture of greatness and goodness”[25]. Envy carries a sense of selfish ambition and zeal and it links to the very problem James states prior to this verse, about the pursuit of “spiritual office” by the false teachers[26].
b.      Selfish Ambition
The Greek word for selfish ambition is “eritheian” (ἐριθείαν, KJV translates as strife and NAS as self-interest), which could refer that the teachers minister out of their own agenda and for their own personal interest. 
Application
The intention and motive of the false teachers are not new to many of us we serve in the church. Sometimes unknowingly we have allowed ourselves to prioritize our own benefits and achievements above the cause of the Gospel. We may teach out of a desire to gain reputation, to build a name for ourselves, to establish our own Babel or like the false teachers, to be seen as “spiritual elites” in the house of God. Churches nowadays spilt for different reasons, but the very core is our unconverted nature that seeks to glorify and increase in ourselves.  
Godly teaching unites believers’ hearts towards God and towards one another whereas ungodly teachings separate believers from God and from one another. Ask the Holy Spirit always to search our heart so that our intentions will be pure and righteous. Our teaching will definitely serve as either a living water which nourishes lives or polluted water that contaminates others’ roots and plantings. Men may look at the outward appearance (or performance) but God looks at the hearts. We need to build something that could go through His testing fire.  
3.      RESULTS OF WISDOMS
We have discussed about the sources and the characteristics of the two wisdoms contrasted by James, and the last section is about the consequences or results of these two wisdoms:
3.1    TRUE WISDOM
(James 3:18 NIV) Peacemakers who sow in peace reap a harvest of righteousness.
True wisdom encompasses all the goodness of God within it as it carries the nature and the character of God, who is holy, righteous and just. James points out that those who sincerely applying God’s wisdom shall be witnessed and justified in his acts of sowing and reaping.    
a.       Sow in Peace
The Greek word for sow is speiretai”(σπείρεται), and peace is “eirēnē” (εἰρήνη), which talks about those intentional acts done by peacemaker who desire to walk in line with the truth of God. The inner traits mentioned in 3.1 cause the birth of this act which makes peace with God and with others.  
b.      Reap a Harvest of Righteousness
The Greek word for righteousness is “dikaiosynēs” (δικαιοσύνης). Moo refers it as the same conduct stated in 1:2 wanting to please God[27]. This is reaping of the result of the above intentional act of sowing in peace.
Application
Sow a seed of righteousness and we shall harvest abundance in righteousness. What we harbor in our hearts will definitely come out in our actions, and reaps the corresponding harvest of its kind. As teachers of the Word, it is important that we speak of peace producing reconciliation and restoration. Speak well of others and speak the truth, that we shall reap the harvest of goodness and truth.
3.2  FALSE WISDOM
(James 3: 14NIV) But if you harbor bitter envy and selfish ambition in your hearts, do not boast about it or deny the truth.
a.    Disorder
The Greek word is “akatastasia” (ἀκαταστασία, KJV translates as confusion), it is said to be the noun form of adjectives used by James in 1:8 and 3:8 for those who are double-minded and with double-speaking tongues[28]. Richard Wolff has associated this state of disorder characterized by the Jewish nation by then where tumult and anarchy were stirred by the Zealots everywhere and the church was perceived to be highly influenced by the said force[29].
b.    Every Evil Thing
The Greek word for evil is “phaulon” (φαῦλον, NAS translates as evil or bad), denotes to those worthless and demeaning acts. Two of the evil things James did mention is boasting of one’s earthy wisdom and denying the truth of God (James 3:14) and even fights and quarrels (James 4:1-2).
Application
Avoid unnecessary criticisms as many of the teachers of the Word do. Paul’s exhortation to Timothy is also to preserve the truth and to run away from endless myths and genealogies. Get rid of comparative talks as we are called to proclaim the gospel and not to promote the churches, ministries, ministers or methodologies. Then the community of Christ will be of less evil and disorder because of boasting of self and denying of truth. 
III.             CONCLUSION
We have to understand thoroughly that what James claims about wisdom is a living with God-centeredness and God-consciousness. It is striving for very moment to honor God and to exalt Him and to allow His truth be part of our very selves. It relates to one’s inner motives and agenda, witnessed vividly by one’s fruits bored by speeches and actions. No one can claim that he is wiser or possess wisdom unless he could really live out the truth by his doings or sayings. “Speak” the “Truth” and “Do” the “Work” is ultimately closely linked with one another when one resorts to demonstrate of his wisdom. This is what James requests of the teachers of His Word and the same implication is for us today. Wisdom could find from nowhere but only be prevalent when God is the source of it. 


















BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barclay, William. The Letters of James & Peter. Edinburgh: The Saint Andrew Press,
1965.

Barclay, William. The Daily Study Bible: The Letters of James and Peter, Translator:
Samuel Chu. Kowloon: Chinese Christian Literature Council Ltd, 1992.

Barrett, Ethel. Will The Real Phony Please Stand Up, Translator: M.L.Leung.
Kowloon: Seed Press Ltd, 1969.

Brosend II, William F. James & Jude. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Caleb, Tang Po Lin. The Unity of Faith & Works. Kowloon: Chinese Baptist Press
International Limited, 2011.

Cheung, Luke L. A Commentary On the Epistle of James. Shatin: Logos Publishers,
2008.

Davids, Peter H. New International Biblical Commentary: James. Peabody:
Hendrickson Publishers, 1989.

Kendall, R.T.  Justification by Works. Bucks: Authentic Media, 2005.

Moo, Douglas J. Tyndale NT Commentaries: James. Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press,
1986.

Nystrom, David P. The NIV Application Commentary: James. Grand Rapids:
Zondervan Publishing House, 1997.

Richardson, Kurt A. The New American Commentary. Nashville: Broadman &
Holman Publishers, 1997.

Tasker, R.V.G. The General Epistle of James. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Berdmans
Publishing Company, 1980.

Tong, Peter C. P. Faith & WorksCommentary on the Epistles of James. Taipei:
Campus Evangelical Fellowship, 1980.

Wiersbe, Warren W., Be Mature. Wheaton : Victor Books, 1981.

Wolff, Richard, Contemporary Commentaries: General Epistles of James and Jude.
Wheaton: Tyndale House Publishers, 1969.

赖若瀚. 永活的信仰. Kowloon: 恩谷出版有限公司, 2002.






[1] Douglas J. Moo, Tyndale NT Commentaries: James (Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 1986), 50.
[2] Kurt A. Richardson, The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman & Holman Publishers, 1997), 55.
[3] David P. Nystrom, The NIV Application Commentary: James (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1997), 204.
[4] R.T. Kendall, Justification by Works (Bucks: Authentic Media, 2005), 261.
[5] William Barclay, The Letters of James & Peter (Edinburgh: The Saint Andrew Press, 1965), 110.
[6] Luke L. Cheung, A Commentary On the Epistle of James (Shatin: Logos Publishers, 2008), 224.
[7] Nystrom, The NIV Application Commentary: James, 207.
[8] Moo, Tyndale NT Commentaries: James,134.
[9] 赖若瀚, <永活的信仰>, (Kowloon: 恩谷出版有限公司, 2002), 235.
[10] Warren W. Wiersbe, Be Mature (Wheaton : Victor Books, 1981), 106.
[11] William Barclay, The Daily Study Bible: The Letters of James and Peter, Translator: Samuel Chu (Kowloon: Chinese Christian Literature Council Ltd, 1992), 110.
[12] 赖若瀚, <永活的信仰>, 235.
[13] Moo, Tyndale NT Commentaries: James, 134.
[14] Peter H. Davids, New International Biblical Commentary: James (Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 1989), 89.
[15] Barclay, The Daily Study Bible: The Letters of James and Peter, 110.
[16] 赖若瀚, <永活的信仰>, 236.
[17] Ethel Barrett, Will The Real Phony Please Stand Up, Translator: M.L.Leung (Kowloon: Seed Press Ltd, 1969), 117.
[18] Richardson, The New American Commentary, 162.
[19] Wiersbe, Be Mature, 110.
[20] Nystrom, The NIV Application Commentary: James, 212.
[21] Ibid, 209.
[22] Barclay, The Daily Study Bible: The Letters of James and Peter, 112.
[23] Nystrom, The NIV Application Commentary: James, 209.
[24] Barclay, The Daily Study Bible: The Letters of James and Peter, 112.
[25] Barclay, The Letters of James & Peter, 106.
[26] Wiersbe, Be Mature, 108.
[27] Moo, Tyndale NT Commentaries: James, 137.
[28] Ibid, 134.
[29] Richard Wolff, Contemporary Commentaries: General Epistles of James and Jude (Wheaton : Tyndale House Publishers, 1969), 64.

Monday, 23 July 2012

Pastoral Epistles Q&A Study

(Apr 2012: "Pastoral Epistles": Q&A study exam)

Q1: From the Pastoral Epistles, discuss in detail Paul’s relationship with Timothy?
A1: Paul’s relationship with Timothy is vividly depicted through his instructions, admonitions and encouragements given to Timothy, and sharing to Timothy about his personal burden, loneliness, needs, passion and sufferings. Three aspects we could observe from the Pastoral Epistles about their relationship:
      Firstly, it is of father-son relationship. Timothy was called by Paul to be his true son in the faith (1Tim 1:2) and his dear son (2Tim 1:2). William Barclay explained “true” (gnesios) as a formal address towards one’s legitimate son or genuine son. Paul acts like a spiritual father to Timothy. While Eunice and Lois couched Timothy in the way of the Lord, Paul is the father who enhances Timothy’s spiritual growth in God.
      Secondly, it is of master-servant (or discipler-disciple) relationship. They are co-workers in the Lord. Timothy has been one of Paul’s closest assistants and followers, and Paul trusts that Timothy possesses the same heartbeat and faithfulness towards the churches and the gospel of Christ. Thus Timothy is entrusted by Paul to remain in Ephesus to guard and defend the Truth. In 2 Timothy 1:8-14, Paul demands of Timothy’s loyalty towards him and the gospel he preaches. Paul always says Timothy “knows all” about his teachings and happenings. Gordon D. Fee denotes this to be close relationship of a disciple to his master.
       Thirdly, there is a strong personal friendship between Paul and Timothy. Paul could share his heart-felt needs and struggles to Timothy, especially when he is in chain and without friends. He desires of Timothy’s companionship and presence in the midst of his imprisonment waiting for execution (2 Tim 4:9, 13). 


Q2: What role do metaphors of the family and household play in the Pastoral Epistles?
A2:   The word “oikos” as explained by John R. Stott can mean either a physical house or building, or a family or household who occupies the building. In the Pastoral Epistles it denotes to Christians who gather themselves to worship at houses they stay in or the community they live in. Thus 1 Timothy 3:15 refers God’s household as the church of the living God.
      Gordon D. Fee says that the metaphors of family and household help people to recognize the authority of God as the Father, believers as brothers and sisters and apostles as stewards or household managers. Each has a role to play in the family.
      As household of God, people are to behave in accordance with family rules and conduct codes laid down, under the guidance and leadership of the apostles, and to relate daily with one another in such a way demonstrating God’s love and grace. Therefore Paul’s exhortations towards Timothy is that he is to treat the older men like father, the younger men as brothers, the older women as mothers and the younger women as sisters, with absolute purity (1 Timothy 5:1-2). And as stewards or household managers, the apostles are to teach the Word of God so that people are able to be instructed in the Way of the Lord to live a godly community life which edifies and builds up one another. The elders over the households are to function as spiritual guardians for the family members. Those who are underprivileged in the family (e.g. the real widows) are to be taken care of by the household of God.


Q3: From the Pastoral Epistles, discuss Paul’s view of the role of leaders in the churches under his care.
A3: The leaders in the churches mentioned in the Pastoral Epistles under Paul’s care are overseers or elders (episkopos) and deacons (diakonos). According to John Stott, an Episkopos is God’s household manager or steward, who is in charge for dispensing spiritual food to the people of God under his care and leadership. He is to act as a mouthpiece or spokesman for God, ministering and pasturing in care and love like a shepherd over his flock. Thus an elder or overseer should possess gift of teaching in rebuking, correcting and training His people in righteousness (2Tim 3:16). In the cases of Timothy and Titus, they are to teach sound doctrines in accordance with the gospel Paul preached and to refute the false teachings in the churches they pastor.
      Diakonos is referred to a waiter who serves at the table. Therefore a deacon is someone who assists the overseer in some specialized ministries or administration of a church.
      In order to perform their pastoral and leadership roles, the overseers (or elders) and deacons have to demonstrate first their leadership and pastoral care towards their family, managing their household under proper condition. They have to live a godly life with requirements listed in 1Tim 3:1-13 and Titus 1:6-9, inclusive of good character and disciplined exemplary lifestyle, so that they could be role models for the whole church to imitate. They have to run the church with integrity and live a consistent life within and without the church, so that they could gain a good name among outsiders to facilitate the spread and advancement of gospel too.       

Q4: Analyze and elaborate on Paul’s understanding of “sound teaching” in the Pastoral Epistles?
A4: Paul’s understanding of “sound teaching” in the Pastoral Epistles possesses few characteristics in terms of its source, its content, its intention and its result. According to Gordon D. Fee it is a medical metaphor to the “healthiness” of teaching found in the gospel of Jesus Christ:
a)      The source and content of “sound teaching” are based on the instruction of our Lord Jesus Christ (1Tim 6:3) which is inherited by the apostles and passed on to generations of believers. It is gospel message which is like a good deposit given to Timothy which he is to guard and to teach with faith and love in Christ Jesus (2Tim 1:13-14). It is contrasted to the false doctrines taught by certain men, who devote themselves to myths and endless genealogies promoting controversies rather than faith (1Tim 1: 3-4), which sources from deceiving spirits and demons (1Tim 4:1-3).
b)      The intention and result of “sound teaching” are to make the proper and good use of the law (1Tim 1:8), to prevent ungodliness and law-breaking (1Tim 1:9) and promote the glory of God in the church. It enhances faith level of the believers, increases godliness in their characters, makes them wiser and produces righteous living and behaviors etc. The aim and product of “sound teaching” shall be good works done in love towards Christ and towards one another, and a hope towards eschatological salvation in Christ Jesus (2Tim 3:15-16). “Sound teaching” is in contrast to false teaching which is of form without power. It is life-giving and live-transforming, not seeking of self-interest but interest of others.      

Friday, 20 July 2012

Evaluation on Paul's Writing of Pastoral Epistles

(Apr 2012: "Pastoral Epistles": Essay paper "Evaluation of diffrences made on writing letters to individuals rather than congregation")

I.                   INTRODUCTION

The Pastoral Epistles (PE) are Paul’s instructions addressed to Timothy and Titus, whom he considers as true sons in their common faith (1Timothy 1:2; Titus 1:2), reminding them purposes of being left behind in Ephesus (1Timothy 1:3 to refute false teachers and to teach sound doctrines) and Crete (Titus 1:5 to put in order what is left unfinished and to appoint elders in every town) respectively. Internal evidences found in the text, especially the plural personal pronounce “you” used in 1Timothy 4:6 and the closing salutations of 1Timothy 6: 21, Titus 3:15 and 2Timothy 4:22 reveal that these letters are more than for personal reading. Gordon Fee[1], John Stott[2] and C. Michael Moss[3] have unanimously agreed that PE are written by Paul directly to Timothy and Titus with an intention of their contents being recited to the congregation as a whole.

The following section of evaluation helps us to understand why Paul writes these three letters to individuals rather than to the entire church, and the differences caused by such intentional writing and arrangement.

II.                EVALUATION ON PE

The PE makes certain impacts on all three parties, the writer Paul, the individual recipients Timothy and Titus, and the churches in Ephesians and Cretans. I will further elaborate these in three aspects.    

1.      PE SERVES AS INSTRUCTION MANUALS FOR TIMOTHY AND TITUS AS PASTORS OVER CHURCHES IN EPHSUS AND CRETE

The PE can serve as instruction manuals for Timothy and Titus who pastor the churches in Ephesus and Crete, so that they could teach and monitor the church, in order that the people of God know how to conduct themselves in His household, the Church of living God (1Timothy 3:15), devoting themselves in good works and living productive lives (Titus 3:14) as witnesses to the world.[4]

1.1  IN TERM OF TEACHERS AND THEIR TEACHINGS

Firstly, the letters deal extensively against false teachers, their doctrines and agendas (1Timothy 1:3-11, 4:1-5, 6:3-10; 2Timothy 1:13-14, 2:16-19, 3:6-9 & Titus 1:10-16, 3:9-11). Paul charges both Timothy and Titus to forbid and rebuke those false teachers and their error teachings. Timothy and Titus are commanded to hold on to the truth imparted to them, to live their lives in godliness and to teach sound and healthy doctrines in line with the gospel of Jesus Christ (1Timothy4:11-16, 6:11-12, 20; 2Timothy 1:8, 13, 2:15, 4:2-5; Titus 2:1).

Paul does not indicate in details the content of sound and healthy teaching, but he does describe throughout the letters some positive behavioral products this teaching will bring forth. He may perceive Timothy and Titus who have been with him for years in mission and ministry to understand what these teachings mean. These healthy teachings will ultimately lead them to proper Christian behavior, love and good work, and eliminate negative effects of controversies, abusiveness, arrogance and strife caused by diseased teachings of the false teachers.[5]

The content of false teachings and contrasting behavioral measurements in accordance with false and sound teachings listed down by Paul could be used as references for both Timothy and Titus. In observing community living, they could then take necessary and wise actions to protect the church from contamination and destruction. Thus the church as a whole could also differentiate the conditions and identify who their real shepherds are.

1.2  IN TERM OF LEADERSHIP APPOINTMENT AND QUALIFICATIONS

Titus is entrusted with the task to appoint elders in every town under the direction of Paul. Though Church in Ephesus is a well established congregation with elders functioning actively, it seems obvious that some of the elders are the very exact false teachers who lead the church astray[6], as elders are given authority to teach the Word of God. In those days, the position of an authoritative teacher is almost equal to a modern day pastor.[7] Therefore it seems that there is a possibility for Timothy to remove existing elders who spread false teachings and to re-appoint those who are qualified for the office.

In order to give guidelines for young Timothy and Titus to discern, so that they will be effective in their roles of selecting, appointing and training of the upcoming overseers/elders, deacons etc in the two churches, Paul does lay down his requirements clearly in 1Timothy 3:1-13 & Titus 1:6-9. These leadership qualifications also serve as personal guidelines for Timothy and Titus who are currently pastoring the churches when the letters are written. What Paul emphasizes and requires of elders/overseers are their godly character and temperament, ability to manage their families, good relationship both with people inside and outside of the church and their ability to teach. He is more interested in the reliability rather than the status of those men who will be chosen.[8]

1.3    IN TERM OF RELATIONSHIP AND RIGHT LIVING IN THE CHURCH

Paul spends another section coaching Timothy and Titus the skills of leadership in relating to different people groups in their churches. One of the requirements of being overseers/elders is their ability to relate to those under their care. In 1Timothy 5:1-2 and Titus 2:1-8, Paul makes it clear they are to relate with elderly men and women as well as younger men and women as a family, treating them like parents and siblings and teach them in the way of the Lord. Further instructions are given for Timothy to deal with young and old widows (1Timothy 5:3-16) and elders who deserve of double honor (1Timothy 5:17-20), and for Timothy and Titus to deal with slaves (1Timothy 6:1-2; Titus 2:9-10).

2.      PE SERVES AS AFFIRMATION TOWARDS THE AUTHORITY GIVEN TO TIMOTHY AND TITUS OVER THE CHURCHES THEY PASTOR

The letters sent by Paul speaks of his apostolic authority over the receiving churches. The fact that Timothy and Titus receive Paul’s letters and are inquired to read aloud these letters signifies that they are representatives of Paul and they too carry apostolic authority. They are fully aware of the content of Paul’s gospel,[9] and are obliged to teach the two churches as instructed. The churches will recognize and be assured once again of their delegated authority upon hearing the letters.

2.1    IN TERM OF TIMOTHY & THE EPHESIANS

Paul exhorts Timothy not to be despised by others though he is young but to live an exemplary life and speech in love, faith and purity (1Timothy 4:12). He admonishes Timothy not to be timid, instead possessing Spirit of power and love and of sound mind (2Timothy 1:7) as God has ordained him minister over Ephesians. Regardless of his sense of inadequacy, Timothy is reminded by Paul of his spiritual gift bestowed by God and confirmed through prophecy and laying on of hands by the elders, and he is to be rekindled by the fire of his call, and to carry out his mandate faithfully (1Timothy 4:14; 2Timothy 1:6).

Due to his timidity and youth, Timothy might see himself improper to function as spiritual leader over the Church of Ephesus which is quite well established and with elders already functioned in place. He might not be courageous enough to rebuke those false teachers. Paul’s letter to him affirms him of his delegated authority received from the apostle. His personal letters to Timothy and his repetitive indication of his name are great encouragement to fearful Timothy. By affirming Timothy’s genuineness, Paul aims to reinforce his authority in the church too.[10] The church will be awakened by Paul’s warning and be sensitive to risks exposed to her. The false teachers and their false teachings will then be scrutinized by the entire church.   

2.2    IN TERM OF TITUS & THE CRETANS

The Cretans are widely known as liars, evil brutes and lazy gluttons (Titus 1:12). By stating these, Paul reminds Titus of his great challenge ahead, and Cretan believers of their nature and a need to be transformed by the grace and love of Christ.

In fact, Titus has encountered opposition from the Hellenistic Jewish converts who emphasize circumcision (Titus 1:10-11), and he is entrusted by Paul to teach what is appropriate in sound doctrines (Titus 2:1). Paul spurs Titus to encourage and rebuke with authority and do not let others despise him (Titus 2:15). Thus Titus is probably busy in settling internal conflicts arisen within the church itself.  

In addition, Titus’ task as revealed by Paul’s letter is to lead the church to live a community life doing good works and being a testimony to the outsiders. The good works will provide a means for the minister and his church to make a greater impact on the non-believers.[11] By writing such letter, Paul provides Titus direction to build up those Cretan believers. They will come to know the importance of living a godly life. The letter gives comfort and strength to Titus who is perhaps at odd with the behavioral trend found in the church. As a pastor who is new to his environment, Paul’s words definitely bring light and hope to him.

3.      PE SERVES AS A PERSONAL EXPRESSION OF FATHER-SONHOOD LOVE AND COMMITMENT BETWEEN PAUL AND TIMOTHY/TITUS

Paul functions more than a comrade to Timothy and Titus in their missionary endeavors. He is a more of a spiritual leader as well as spiritual father to his young apprentices. They have travelled long enough to understand one another, and they have experienced hardships together to come to know the price they have to pay.

Thus Paul could share freely in these letters incidents and people with the trust that Timothy and Titus could identify with. The PE could be seen as directives given by Paul who perceive his impending death without any further opportunity to give orally to his two collaborators.[12]

3.1  THE DESIRE OF PAUL TO HAVE THEM ALONGSIDE WITH HIM

Paul desires of Titus’ presence to be with him in Nicopolis. He intends to arrange Artemas or Tychicus to replace Titus in Crete and to relieve him to Nicopolis in the winter. Winters might be the season Paul uses to regroup, rethink, reconceive his mission[13]. Therefore Paul wants Titus to be there to strategize together.

In 2 Timothy Paul perceives a sure death sentence for him from the Roman government, he urges Timothy to go over to him before close down of sea transportation during the winter. Timothy has been Paul’s closest disciple and fellow-worker, and they have been through thick and thin. Timothy is present in most of Paul’s eventful moments, e.g. in Athens, Corinth and Ephesus, and he is sent by Paul to Corinth, Thessalonica and Macedonia etc. Most of the times, he is one of co-writer for Paul’s epistles.[14]

The PE expresses Paul’s desires to be with his beloved disciples. It is heart-felt sharing of Paul’s personal needs for the presence of his followers.

3.2  THE DESIRE OF PAUL TO PASS THE BATON OF GOSPEL TO HIS TRUE SON TIMOTHY

Paul urges for Timothy’s loyalty towards him by illustrating contrasting examples between Onesiphorus the faithful, and Phygelus and Hermogenes the unfaithful towards his own leadership (2Timothy 1:15-18), spurring him to join in sufferings for Christ (2Timothy 2: 1:13). He demands of Timothy not to be ashamed of the Gospel and not to be ashamed of him who is in chain.

Paul wants to make sure that after his departure, Timothy will be faithful in continuing his journey of faith, to be faithful to preach sound doctrines which derives from the gospel of Jesus Christ (2Timothy 1:13-14, 2:15) and to entrust to reliable men who will also be qualified to teach others (2Timothy 2:1-7).

It is common for an old man like Paul who thinks occasionally of transferring his apostolic office and passing his leadership baton unto someone he could trust. Timothy may rank the highest priority in his choice as he is seen by Paul possessing the same heartbeat with him for Philippians, and maybe towards all the churches they have co-planted. Through the PE, Paul demonstrates his deepest concern towards the future and ministry of Timothy.

III.             CONCLUSION

The PE definitely is Paul’s pastoral concerns and requests in words towards Timothy and Titus prior to his concerns for churches under them. In writing to Timothy and Titus individually, he has indeed strengthened the faith and affirm of their spiritual authority over Ephesians and Cretans. The PE shows how to guide the churches in righteous communal living pertaining to right relationship, behavior and teachings. The churches in turn will learn how to honor and respect their leaders and their authority and to follow the footsteps of their shepherds as they follow Paul who follows Christ unconditionally.
 


[1] Gordon D. Fee, New International Biblical Commentary: 1&2 Timothy & Titus (Peabody : Hendrickson Publishers, Inc., 1984), 10, 302.
[2] John R.W. Stott, The Message of Timothy & Titus (Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 1997), 38 & 167.
[3] C. Michael Moss, Ph.D., The College Press NIV Commentary: 1, 2 Timothy & Titus (Joplin: College Press Publishing Company, 1997), 11,128, 251-252.
[4] William Barclay, The Daily Study Bible: The Letters to Timothy, Titus and Philemon, Translated by Man Kok Wai (Kowloon: Chinese Christian Literature Council, 1986), 140.
[5] Gordon D. Fee, New International Biblical Commentary: 1&2 Timothy & Titus, 46.
[6] Gordon D. Fee, New International Biblical Commentary: 1&2 Timothy & Titus, 8.
[7] Thomas D. Lea & Hayne P. Griffin, Jr., The New American Commentary, 1 & 2 Timothy, Titus (Nashiville: B&H Publishing Group, 1992), 104.
[8] Thomas D. Lea & Hayne P. Griffin, Jr., The New American Commentary, 1 & 2 Timothy, Titus, 202.
[9] Gordon D. Fee, New International Biblical Commentary: 1&2 Timothy & Titus, 10.
[10] John R.W. Stott, The Message of Timothy & Titus, 40.
[11] C. Michael Moss, Ph.D., The College Press NIV Commentary: 1, 2 Timothy & Titus, 135.
[12] Mark Harding, Tradition and Rhetoric in the Pastoral Epistles (New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc., 1998), 17.
[13] Thomas C. Oden, First and Second Timothy and Titus Interpretation: A Bible Commentary for Teaching and Preaching (Louisville: John Knox Press, 1989), 167.
[14] William Barclay, The Daily Study Bible: The Letters to Timothy, Titus and Philemon, 33-34.



BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barclay, William. The Daily Study Bible: The Letters to Timothy, Titus and Philemon,
      Translator: Man Kok Wai. Kowloon: Chinese Christian Literature Council, 1986.

Fee, Gordon D. New International Biblical Commentary: 1&2 Timothy & Titus.
      Peabody : Hendrickson Publishers, Inc., 1984.

Harding, Mark. Tradition and Rhetoric in the Pastoral Epistles. New York: Peter
      Lang Publishing, Inc., 1998.

Lea, Thomas D. & Hayne P. Griffin, Jr. The New American Commentary, 1 & 2
      Timothy, Titus. Nashiville: B&H Publishing Group, 1992.

Moss, C. Michael. The College Press NIV Commentary: 1, 2 Timothy & Titus. Joplin:
      College Press Publishing Company, 1997.

Oden, Thomas C. First and Second Timothy and Titus Interpretation: A Bible
      Commentary for Teaching and Preaching. Louisville: John Knox Press, 1989.

Pierson, Lance. In the Steps of Timothy. Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 1995.

Stott, John R.W. The Message of Timothy & Titus. Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 1997.

Young, Frances. The Theology of the Pastoral Letters. New York: Cambridge
      University Press, 1994.