Wednesday 21 November 2012

Inter-Faith Dialogue


(Nov2012: Religion & Cults: Examination Question: Inter- faith dialogue 'Jesus is the only Way to Salvation)
1.      You are invited to explain your Christian faith in an inter-faith dialogue that included the following religious participation, namely Hinduism, Buddhism and Islam. The topic given to you is, ‘The concept of Salvation a common denominator in Religions’. How would you present this paper biblically? How would you appropriately present the Christian exclusive concept of salvation that is ‘Jesus is the only way to salvation’?
Answer:
Before looking into the Christianity concept of salvation, let’s have a brief understanding of how Hinduism, Buddhism and Islam look at salvation and the way to salvation, and I would like to base on some common grounds to present my points.
The followers of Hinduism do not believe that man is inherently a sinner. Instead they believe that man is born with a divine nature, and human soul is good in nature. A man starts his journey of searching of his inner soul once he is born, and will reach his full divinity that leads him to the Supreme Reality, i.e. God. Therefore for Hinduism, there is neither concept of hell nor eternal condemnation. For them there is only God, soul and cosmos. Human beings are on their process of realizing their inner divinity. There are many ways that lead towards the Supreme Reality, and each soul is responsible to find his or her own way.
The followers of Buddhism believe that man is driven by his inner desires after this life, and is thus bounded up by suffering, anxiety and dissatisfaction. Buddhism seeks for a way out of the circle of birth, aging, sickness and death. They believe in the concept of karma and reincarnation. They believe that karma (one’s deeds and speech) will determine where he will go, and the man will be trapped in a circle of reincarnation until his ‘karma (fruits of his good deed) is full and that will lead him ultimately to the state of Nirvana. There are eightfold paths (right View (or Right Understanding), Right Intention (or Right Thought), Right Speech, Right Action, Right Livelihood, Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, and Right Concentration) that will lead one to Nirvana.
The followers of Islam believe that Allah is the Only God in the universe and He is sovereign and all men are called to submit to the will of Allah. Man has sins in this life and the only way for him to be kept away from sins is to obey the instructions given in the Quran and Hadith. He is to live up to the standard of Allah, observing the five pillars of faith, believing Allah is God and Muhammad is His prophet, fasting during the Ramadan month, pray five times a day, giving alms to the poor and fulfill the ritual of pilgrimage to Mecca at least once in a lifetime. Muslims have no guarantee to be kept from hell as Allah has the absolute authority to decide who is to be rewarded and who is to be punished.
The followers of Christianity believe strongly and unanimously that ‘Jesus is the only way to salvation’. Jesus Christ has proclaimed in John 14:6 that He is the Way, the Truth and the Life, and no one will come to the Father except through Him. Christianity provides no alternative for salvation, other than salvation found by putting one’s faith in Jesus Christ. The salvation in Christ is proclaimed throughout centuries of biblical history, even before incarnation of Jesus, because OT has been speaking about the coming of the Messiah.
Unlike Hinduism followers who have to seek his or her own way to reach the Supreme Reality, and Buddhism followers who have to follow the eightfold paths without knowing how many good deeds they have to accumulate and how many rounds of incarnation they have to go through before they reach the Nirvana, and Muslims’ uncertainty about their destiny (whether to hell or heaven) by submitting to Allah’s will and instructions, Christianity expresses with a certain and definite voice that ‘Jesus is the only way to salvation’. There is no other way, and the salvation is sealed when one places his genuine faith in Christ Jesus.  
When Jesus talks about the Way, the Truth and the Life, he talks about His origin. He comes from where the Father is, and He is with the Father since the Beginning, even before the Creation of the world. He is the Creator and He knows His creation. All of the mankind are created beings and we do not exist when and where Jesus has existed before. Since Jesus comes from the Father, He knows exactly the way to be led to the heavenly Father. We do not come the way Jesus comes, and we are basically ignorant of where we will be heading to in eternity (John 8:14). For a blind cannot lead a blind, or both will fall into the pit. (Matthew 15:14)
How could a blind find his way to God? It is completely impossible to do so! All the prophets show the way to God when they are inspired by God and receive His revelation, and all the religions show their ways to eternity. But the prophets are not the way and they are only those means through which the way is pointed. Yet Jesus says uncompromisingly that He is the Way. He is the Only Way! In order to show the way, He was incarnated as a common man, living among us, suffering pains and rejection as we do suffer, and dying on the Cross for our sin, so that we could be redeemed through His blood. He comes to reveal God, to reveal the Way, to reveal that there is a possibility to overcome sin and death with the work He has done on the Cross! Only He is able to redeem, to be the Way to the Father.
Jesus is not an unknown ‘Supreme Being’ which is yet to be discovered and defined through individual experience. He is the promised Messiah, and possessing the very nature of God that is described in the Bible. He is transcendent and immanent, not as permeating forces or all materials in cosmos, but as in the person of Jesus who walks on earth as man like us. He lives and overcomes sin and death, and points us to the Father and eternity.
Christianity does not promote salvation by work, though we are saved to do good work. Good works do not contribute or give merits to our salvation. Salvation is purely and fully by the grace of God, when God gives His One and Only begotten Son, who dies for our sin, and restores our relationship with God that was once marred and broken due to our rebellion towards God, once we have confess our faith in Jesus Christ (Ephesians 2:8). No amount of prayers, alms-giving will be able to save us from eternal fire, but calling on the name of Jesus and put our faith in Him.
Jesus is incarnated once, and He now lives forever. He dies and redeems us once and for all. There is no need for repetitive act of salvation from Him on us as individual, though we have to repeatedly rely on Him to overcome weaknesses in our lives so that we could lead a victorious living.
From the above analysis of Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam and Christianity faith, we can conclude that ‘The concept of Salvation a common denominator in Religions’, for all men are looking for a way or many ways to be saved from this sinful world or our own sinful nature. But how can one find way in the sinful world or with our sinful nature? It is completely impossible! The help must be from God. It is not a process that we try to be saved, but it is a process that He offers and shows the Way!   

The War on Jesus Christ


(Nov2012: Religion & Cults: Apologetic Paper: 'The War on Jesus Christ')
I.     INTRODUCTION
Christianity, Judaism and Islam are known to be the only three religions recognized as monotheism. Yet the identity of Jesus Christ and His associated work of salvation on the Cross have always been the divisive points that separate Christianity from Judaism and Islamic beliefs of monotheism, and rendered it to be polytheism in those eyes of Muslims. The core value of Christianity is the belief that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and He is the Second Person in the Trinity, and He is indeed God incarnated and Word becoming flesh, living on earth for about thirty-three years, dying on the cross for the sin of the mankind, resurrected on the third day after His death and then ascending onto heaven after forty days of mingling around with His disciples, and He is to come a Second Time on the Day of Judgment and Restoration.
Muslims deny the divinity of Christ Jesus, seeing him only as one of the prophets preceding the Last Prophet of Allah, Muhammad. They refuse to believe that Jesus was crucified and resurrected and He is the Savior and the Lord for all mankind. Jesus’ name has been appeared in Quran for twenty-five times, much more than the name Muhammad is mentioned (only four times). A belief in Jesus (known as Isa in Quran) and all the prophets in precedence to him, and the Seal of prophet after him is a compulsory requirement in Islamic faith. Yet Muslims’ understanding of Jesus is greatly deviated from biblical images we find in the Word of God.
Section II below shows the war between Islamic and biblical faith on the person of Jesus Christ, and an apologetic conclusion is drawn in each section defending who Jesus really is and what He has truly accomplished for the salvation of mankind.
II.   THE WAR ON JESUS CHRIST                                         (BETWEEN ISLAMIC AND BIBLICAL FAITH)
There are mainly three issues discussed below about the war on Jesus Christ, divided into the following three sections of arguments, which are: Jesus as God’s incarnation and revelation, Jesus as the Son of God (divinity and trinity) and Jesus as the crucified and risen Christ (the Savior and Lord of the world).
A.   JESUS AS GOD’S INCARNATION AND REVELATION
a)    Islamic belief
Quran says that Jesus is the son of Mary, and she conceives in her virginity after the archangel Gabriel has dictated to her the decree from Allah. Muslims see Mary’s impregnation as a supernatural act of Allah (by the Spirit referred as Gabriel), but they deny strongly that He is God incarnated, or the Word revealed to men in flesh.   
The concept of God’s incarnation is a foreign and horrible thought to Muslims as Islam believes in twin doctrines of tanzih (separateness) and mukhalafah (otherness), that Allah is a remote and sovereign entity separating Himself from all of His creation, inclusive of all men[1]. Therefore it is totally unbelievable and blasphemed for them to perceive the idea that Jesus is the Son of God, who is God becoming flesh revealing Himself to His people the very nature and person of Godhead. For them it is completely and absolutely impossible that God will ever dwell among the mortalities.
Quran is understood by Muslims to be the eternal heavenly revelation received by the Prophet Muhammad within a period of twenty-three years, and it is considered undoubtedly as the authentic and final Word of God. Prior to Quran, there are said to have three main books given to His people, which are the Law given through Moses, the Psalm given through David and the Gospel (Injil) given through Jesus. Quran supersedes all these books in its status and authority as the Word from Allah, and is the final and seal of God’s revelation. Muslims thus refuse to believe that God reveals Himself through the incarnation of Jesus Christ. They do believe that Allah wants to make His will known to His people, and that is the reason He has sent His prophets throughout all generations and has finally given them the heavenly book, the Quran. But Muslims do not believe that Allah would ever intend to reveal Himself and make Himself known physically and personally to His people. 
b)      Biblical belief
The Bible clearly, consistently and decisively says that Jesus is God’s incarnation and He is the visible and physical revelation of God. The Bible says in John 1:1, ‘In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.’ The apostle John tells us that Jesus is indeed the Word, and He is God of eternity since the beginning, even before the Creation of the world. John 1:3 further informs us that God creates all things through Jesus, and is corresponded to the narrative records found in Genesis 1, where God creates the world with the Word spoken, ‘Let there be…’.  Whatever God has proclaimed with His word, it is created and established, and the world comes into being.
The ‘Word’ John refers to, comes into the world but is rejected by the world He has created. He is the Word ever existed in heaven before all creation, and He is the Bread from heaven that gives life to many who choose to believe in Him. The Bible portrays God both to have the nature of transcendence and immanence. He is sovereign God who is above all creations, yet He is also God who dwells among His people, with the divine presence of Jesus as the Son of man, and subsequently the indwelling of the Holy Spirit in those who receive Him as the Lord and Savior.
c)    Apologetic Views
We strongly believe in the biblical truth that Jesus is the incarnation of God, the Word becoming flesh based on two evidences. Firstly, those inner evidences found in the Bible itself show a consistent pattern pointing towards an event of incarnation. Isaiah 7:14 tells us a virgin birth where the child shall be called ‘Immanuel’ (God with us). Isaiah 9: 6 indicates to us that a child is born and that child is referred to as the Mighty God, Everlasting Father and Prince of Peace. Ezekiel 37:26-27 talks about the Sanctuary of God will be found among His people forever, where the Sanctuary is interpreted to be the body of Messiah, a community that He has established on earth through His death and resurrection. Micah 5:2 prophesizes a ruler of Israel is to be born in the small town of Bethlehem. Colossians 1:15-16 states that Christ is ‘the image of the invisible God’ and ‘by him all things were created.’ John 1:18 declares that ‘no one has ever seen God, but God the one and Only, who is at the Father’s side, has made him known.’ It goes beyond Muslims’ perception of merely Word becoming flesh (or a common man), but Word that is mentioned in John 1:1, by Whom the Creator creates all things, and by Whom the world is established.
Secondly, we discover that Quran agrees with Bible in a way that it acknowledges Jesus as the Word of God in three incidences. Quran 3:45 asserts that the ‘good news of a word from Allah’ to Mary ‘shall become the known Messiah, Jesus son of Mary’. The ‘word’ from Allah shall become flesh, known as the Messiah. Quran 4:171 further affirms that ‘the Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, was only a messenger of God, and His word which he conveyed unto Mary.’ Quran thus acknowledges that Jesus is a messenger, and He is the Word of Allah. Quran 3:39 indicates that John brings us good news which confirms a word from God. Jesus is said to be God’s ‘word’. He is more than a messenger, but He is the Word itself. He is the Word of God and He is indeed God revealed as Word to mankind. Though prophets of Allah could be addressed as ‘word’ of Allah, but Jesus’ birth is not of a normal birth, His birth is different from all the prophets of Allah recognized by the Muslims. He is the ‘Word’ incarnated, the word of Allah revealed physically.
Quran also echoes the biblical truth of God’s creation by saying that God decrees matters with the word ‘Be’ spoken[2]. It is equivalent to our understanding that Allah creates the world by the Word, Jesus Christ. In his argument of whether Jesus is a prophet or God, the Islamic apologist Prof. Dr. Kh. Hasbullah Bakry Sh has actually said that, ‘the birth of Jesus Christ was the result of God’s Word ‘kun fayakun’ (come into existence, and it comes into existence), which birth was laid upon Mary with the Spirit of God.’[3]
Thus Islamic belief misses out the very essence of the activity of God proclaimed throughout the centuries by all His prophets. He is more than the Word of Allah. He is the Word incarnated, and lives on earth as man, speaking, living and demonstrating the life and power of the Almighty God. He teaches about the truth of the Kingdom, He demonstrates the extraordinary power that comes from Heaven and He lives an exemplary life with Kingdom oriented mindset, submission to God unto His death on the Cross.  
B.   JESUS AS THE SON OF GOD: DIVINITY AND TRINITY
a)    Islamic belief
Jesus is viewed by Muslims as one of the five greatest prophets (Adam, Noah, Abraham Moses and Jesus)[4] before the coming of the last Prophet Muhammad, sent by Allah to make known His decrees and commands. Yet He is recognized as a prophet specifically assigned by Allah to instruct the people of Israelites. He is seen by Muslims as possessing the same likeness of Adam to Allah, a historical prophet, a forerunner for the prophet Muhammad, and he confirms Musan Law and endorses the Injil (Quran 61:6), and shows the world the original ‘Christianity’ without the mask put by the Bible or diverted teachings of Christians. He especially serves as a witness to later Pauline’s faulty teachings about the Christ[5].  
Muslims’ perspectives towards the divinity and the doctrine of Trinity are entirely different from the concepts conceived by Christians. For Islamic followers, they know that Quran has stated clearly in 23:90 that Allah has no son and there is no other God beside Allah. Jesus has spoken forth in his infancy that he is a prophet of Allah given with the Book, and he is only a slave of Allah (Quran 19:27-35). He is called the ‘Word of God’, the ‘Messiah’, ‘a Spirit from God’ and commonly referred by Muslim as ‘the Spirit of God’ but He is never called ‘the Son of God’ which convey a physical sense of existence of divinity, and he is forbidden to be worshipped as ‘god’ (Quran 4:169)[6]. Whatever miraculous power he possessed is endowed and allowed by Allah.
The creed of Trinity found in Christianity faith is a stumbling block to Muslims as their mind will tend to understand that Christians indeed are worshipping three gods: The Father, the Mother and the Son[7]. Since Jesus is called the Son of God, Muslims thereby deduce that Christians believe that God the Father has taken a wife to Himself and given birth to a Son Jesus Christ, and thus validated the doctrine of Trinity proclaimed and taught since the fourth century. To them, the concept of Jesus being the Son of God is definitely a corrupted teaching of Jews and Christians. 
The doctrine of Trinity has caused Muslims to misunderstand Christians further, thinking that the later have put Allah (God the Father), Jesus (the Son of God) and Gabriel (The Holy Spirit) together as three persons of Godhood. Thus these Christians are considered as blasphemers of Allah and worshiper of multiple-gods. They are seen as committing serious offence of shirk, because they have associated something with God that is not God[8]. Because Christians have sinned against Allah, they are classified by Quran as unbelievers[9].      
b)    Biblical belief
Andy Bannister discovers through Scriptures that Jesus has never admitted Himself to be one of the prophets of God, a title given to Him by Muslims[10]. In many occasions found in the four Gospels, He instils the thought that He is not of the earth, and He comes from the Father, and He possesses the agenda of Kingdom in His mind and doings. Jesus is constantly conscious of who He is, even when He walks on earth as a man. He never equals Himself to be in the line of prophets, and He never endorses the thought that He has any successive voice or there will be a greater prophet coming after Him. The ‘paraclete’ He refers to is His Spirit and the Spirit of the Father, and never to be understood like Muslims, as ‘Ahmad’ the prophet to come. Acts 1:8 fulfils His prophecy of the coming ‘Holy Spirit’, and vindicates what He has said and promised is true.
Jesus makes clear that He is the Son of Man, which speaks of His eternal Kingship with incomparable authority given to Him by the Father, and also speaks of His mission on earth as the suffering Servant of God. He introduces Himself as the Son of God or the Son, proclaiming an inseverable relationship that He has with the heavenly Father. About 30 times He refers Himself in the Gospel of John as ‘the Son of God’ or ‘the Son’, and 107 times He calls God ‘the Father’ or ‘My Father’[11]. He extols and affirms Simon Peter’s insight when Peter recognizes Him as the Christ, the Son of the living God (Matthew 16:16) or the Messiah/the Christ (Mark 8:29). In the parable of the vineyard (Matthew 21:33-42), He relates Himself to be the only son (the Son of God) among the servants (prophets) sent by the vineyard owner (God the Father) to the tenants to collect the harvest of the fruits. Jesus places Himself above all the prophets sent by God. He is not among them but instead is above all of them. The title of Messiah also indicates that He is the coming King who will restore the glory of God and the people of Israel.   
All the above statements claim that Jesus Christ as the Son of God, and He is truly divine in nature. His identity is foretold by the prophets of all generations, proclaimed by God the Father (Luke 9:35; Matthew 17:5), declared by Jesus Himself, agreed by His disciples of His days, verified by Pauline’s epistles, and witnessed and professed by all Christians throughout the Church history.
The doctrine of Trinity is not an explicit and direct teaching found in the Bible itself. It is so called ‘invented’ and ‘established’ by the Nicene Creed in the 4th century. Yet in certain passages of the Bible, we see the expression of Trinity vividly. First we could discover the fact from the Genesis account of Creation. We are told that God creates the heaven and earth with the word ‘let it be…’spoken, and the Spirit of God is said to hover over the deep waters. This Genesis account of Creation portrays the unison work of the trinity since the beginning of the world. In the book of John we are frequently told by Jesus about the close relationship between the Father, the Son and the Spirit. Some passages in Synoptic Gospels reveal to us the picture of trinity, i.e. the scene when Jesus is baptised by John the Baptist in the River of Jordan, the Father affirms His identity as ‘my beloved Son’ and endowed Him with the descending on of the Holy Spirit.
c)    The Apologetic Views
Muslims renounces the correctness and conciseness of the teachings and records found in the New Testament about the divinity of Christ and His work on the Cross because they consider the Scripture held by Jews and Christians is corrupted due to those cultural influences of Greek and paganism. To them, the books of NT resemble those traditional writings of their prophets and are different with the way Quran presents the Word of God[12]. NT is therefore considered to be greatly deviated from the original Injil or Gospel preached by Jesus the Nazareth, and is deemed to be unreliable and questionable to be used as authoritative manual for the believers. Thus they draw their evidences extensively from the Gospel of Barnabas, the Quran and the Hadith, the traditions written by the Prophet Muhammad and his following Caliphs.
Yet Miller points out that Quran itself has never doubted about the authenticity of the Book (the Scripture) held by the then Christians and Jews[13] (Refer Quran 4: 47 and 10:94, where Christians and Jews are told to believe in Quran confirming their own Scripture, and they are to clear their doubts towards Quran in asking those who read the Book before). If Scripture used by Jews and Christians is the authoritative reference for Quran, then whatever is said in Scripture could not be partially wrong and partially true as claimed by Muslims. If Scripture is true, it is completely reliable and whatever it says about the identity and works of Jesus Christ is true as well.
Miller further argues that the Quran declares in many places that all the prophets are aware that they are sent by Allah with the same purpose and the same message (33:7-8; 23:51-52; 42:13; 5:46; 61:6; 3:35-41; 19:2-15; 3:42-53; 19:16-36). Therefore Quran is saying that the messages proclaimed by all the prophets shall be in consistent and in line with one another. If Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses and Jesus the great prophets and all the prophets ever existed before Jesus have concurred that Jesus Christ is the coming Messiah, the Great King, the Savior of the nations and the Christ, then the revelation proclaimed by Muhammad is indeed in a great contradictory to the truth proclaimed by those previous prophets of him. This will indeed prove that he is not to be considered in the line of prophets sent by God. Since Muhammad cannot be considered as the prophet of God, then whatever he has proclaimed is not to be received as the authentic Word of God.
C.   JESUS AS THE CRUCIFIED AND RISEN CHRIST:                                             THE LORD AND SAVIOR OF THE WORLD
a)    Islamic belief
Islam does not teach on the original sin of mankind which we have inherited from our ancestor Adam since his fall. Instead Islam focuses its teaching on human’s sins which are those wilful acts that go against the will and instructions of Allah. Men have no Savior other than themselves who have to observe the instructions given in the Qur’an and the traditional Hadith in order for them to live rightly and please Allah. They have to abide in the five pillars of their Islamic faith, i.e. faith, prayer, alms giving, fasting and pilgrimage, in order to demonstrate their submission towards Allah.
 Muslims thus believe in merit of work that will save them, though Allah has His absolute power to decide whether one is to be pardoned from judgment or to be condemned. No Muslim is ever assured of his personal salvation. Allah will give His final verdict in accordance with His will whether one is rewarded or punished. Therefore in Islamic belief, the thought of a Savior is totally alien and strange.
It is widely accepted by Muslims that Quran 4: 157-158 denies the claim of Jews that they have killed (crucified) Jesus the Messiah, and their claim is nothing but a mere conjecture. Muslims do not believe that Jesus is the one who is crucified on the Cross. Instead they believe that it is either Judas or Simon the Cyrene who has taken the place of Jesus, and Jesus has miraculously rescued by God. He is taken home to heaven, and he will come again and die a normal death and by then he will be resurrected.   
b)      Biblical beliefs
Bible teaches that man has sinned against God through his deliberate act of rebellion, and every one of us thus is in need personally of a Savior. Jesus Christ is born as a common man like us, but He is sinless and without blemish. He dies on the Cross in obedience to the will of the father, and His poured out blood has taken away the sin of the world, so that men can be reconciled to God and be restored to their original image in God.
The core belief in Christianity is a concept of Savior who is crucified and is resurrected on the third day after His death. Those who call on the name of Jesus Christ and accepted Him as the Savior and the Lord shall be saved from the eternal condemnation. There is no way man could try his own way with his own effort to be saved from the punishment of sin. Only through faith in Jesus Christ shall he overcome sin and death.
Paul in 1 Corinthians 15 declares that the faith of Christians will be considered futile if Christ is not risen from death. Men will still live in their sin and entangled in their sinful state if Christ is not resurrected. If Christ is not crucified and resurrected, the whole belief of Christianity is nothing but a lie. The faith of Christianity stands and falls on the fact of a risen Christ.  
c)    Apologetic Views
In an interview with Muslims, it is admitted by a Muslim scholar saying that, ‘the Arabic of the Quran can in fact be translated in a way that is coherent with the Christian belief that Jesus died on the Cross, but no Muslims reads the Arabic that way.’[14] Thus we could induce from this saying that the understanding of Muslims towards crucifixion of Jesus Christ is biased, because they are always convinced that they are without any need for an atonement of sin by a Savior, and thus nullify the need of crucifixion and resurrection of Christ.
Dave Miller has pointed out the contradictory manner found in Muslim world towards Christians and their beliefs in Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection, arguing that while Quran frequently addresses the term ‘Christians’ in an approving manner, it denies at the same time the very tenet ‘Christians’ have believed and insisted[15]. The stand of Quran is thus inconsistent and self-contradict.
 The Bible tells us that there are many eyes witnesses for both the events of crucifixion and resurrection of Christ Jesus. The lives of the disciples have been tremendously transformed after they have witnessed the resurrected Christ. The early Christians were fervent about their faith and they are even willing to be martyred because they have chosen to believe in the resurrected power of Christ. Their blood has indeed spoken of the undeniable truth found in Jesus Christ.
III.             CONCLUSION
The purpose of the three aspects of argument presented above about the war on the person of Jesus Christ is to find ways to penetrate the core-belief of professed Muslims, enable us to present gospel in a more relevant way to them. We need to know the Muslims’ thought about the Christianity before we could design ways to share to them the good news of Jesus Christ.
It is to be understood that Muslims make a striking contrast between Jesus in Quran and Jesus in the Gospels. The former is recognized by them as real Jesus while the later is accepted by them only to a certain limited degree[16]. They do have high regard and honor towards Jesus as a prophet sent by God, and they believe in whatever the Quran says about the person of Jesus.
Muslims might not think that they need a Savior, but surely they will be desperately in need of God’s love and grace to enable them to be overcomers of their sins. They definitely need God who is near and is able to communicate intimately with them, the God who is the revelation of His Word. In order to convince them of who Jesus really is, it is not enough just to bring out the truth we find in the Bible, but we need to help them to discover the real Isa (Jesus) revealed in the Quran. This will put off their defensive mask and eventually they will be more willing to open themselves to our sharing. If we start with the ‘Isa’ in the Quran, we will eventually find ways to close the big gap of differences between Islamic and Biblical beliefs. For Quran does speak of Jesus as the Word, the servant of Allah, and a ‘Spirit of God’.
   

















BIBLOGRAPHY
Bannister, Andy. The Quest for the lost Jesus: Part 1: Asking questions, Seeking
answers. http://www.answering-islam.org/Andy/quest1.html, 2001. (Access: 19Nov2012)

Bowker, John. Voices of Islam. Oxford: OneWorld Publications, 1995.

Goldsmith, Martin. Islam and Christian Witness.London: Hodder and Stoughton,
1982.

Turner, Ryan. Islam and the Crucifixion of Jesus.

Miller, Dave. The Quran and Christ’s Crucifixion and Resurrection.

Miller, William M. A Christian’s Response to Islam. Phillipsburg: Presbyterian and
Reformed Publishing Co., 1980.

Muhammad ‘Ata Ur-Rahim. Jesus Prophet of Islam. Singapore: Omar Brothers
Publications Pte Ltd, 1991.

Prof. Dr. Kh. Hasbullah Bakry Sh. Jesus Christ in the Qur’an Muhammad in the
Bible: Is Jesus Prophet or God. KL: S. Abdul Majeed & Co., 1990.

Sonship in the Gospel of John.

The Descriptive Titles of Jesus in Quran, http://www.islamreligion.com/articles/229/
(Access date: 19Nov2012)

Zebiri, Kate. Muslims and Christians Face to Face. Oxford: Oneworld Publications,
1997.





[1] Martin Goldsmith, Islam and Christian Witness (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1982), 89.
[2] The Descriptive Titles of Jesus in Quran, http://www.islamreligion.com/articles/229/.
[3] Prof. Dr. Kh. Hasbullah Bakry Sh, Jesus Christ in the Qur’an Muhammad in the Bible: Is Jesus Prophet or God? (KL: S. Abdul Majeed & Co., 1990), 17.
[4] William M. Miller, A Christian’s Response to Islam (Phillipsburg: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing Co., 1980), 47.
[5] Muhammad ‘Ata Ur-Rahim, Jesus Prophet of Islam (Singapore: Omar Brothers Publications Pte Ltd, 1991), 1-5.
[6] Miller, A Christian’s Response to Islam, 49.
[7] Goldsmith, Islam and Christian Witness, 59.
[8] John Bowker, Voices of Islam (Oxford: OneWorld Publications, 1995), 92.
[9] Bakry Sh, Jesus Christ in the Qur’an Muhammad in the Bible: Is Jesus Prophet or God, 18.
[10] Andy Bannister, The Quest for the lost Jesus: Part 1: Asking questions, Seeking answers (http://www.answering-islam.org/Andy/quest1.html, 2001).
[11] Sonship in the Gospel of John, http://www.theopedia.com/Sonship_in_the_Gospel_of_John
[12] Bakry Sh, Jesus Christ in the Qur’an Muhammad in the Bible: Is Jesus Prophet or God,22.
[13] Miller, A Christian’s Response to Islam, 71.
[14] Bowker, Voices of Islam, 93.
[15] Dave Miller, PhD, The Quran and Christ’s Crucifixion and Resurrection, http://www.apologeticspress.org/APContent.aspx?category=8&article=1517.
[16] Kate Zebiri, Muslims and Christians Face to Face (Oxford: Oneworld Publications, 1997), 59. 

Tuesday 13 November 2012

Languages of Love Sung (Song of Songs Homiletic 1:15-2:3)

(Nov 2012: Song of Songs: Homiletic Sermon 1:15-2:3 Languages of Love Sung)


I. INTRODUCTION
We have been audiences of contemporary love songs for years since we learn to appreciate music and lyrics. Many songs sing of the brokenness of their hearts when the lovers fall out of their love, yet there are many songs that sing of the wonders, the greatness and the sweetness of love when the couple are in their passionate loving moments. See how Adele proclaims about the strength of love in her lyrics:
‘Whenever I am alone with you, you make me feel like I am home again.
Whenever I am alone with you, you make me feel like I am whole again.
Whenever I am alone with you, you make me feel like I am young again.
Whenever I am alone with you, you make me feel like I am fun again.
Whenever I am alone with you, you make me feel like I am free again.
Whenever I am alone with you, you make me feel like I am clean again.’
The lyrics above indicate to us that love seems to be a powerful and wonderful therapy or language for those who feel that they are homeless, broken, aging, unhappy, in bondage or contaminated. To many out there in the world, they are seeking for love like seeking a Saviour. Love, spoken or unspoken, is the greatest language of healing and comfort. Is there a love song found in the Bible speaking about couple’s love? Surely it has! Let’s turn to the book of Song of Songs 1:15 and read on to 2:3, and discover the lyrics and languages of love that are sung in the Word of God.  
II.   LANGUAGES OF LOVE SUNG
This passage is a small portion of the Song that was sung centuries ago. It is extolled and attested by the Jewish rabbis as the greatest and superlative song that has ever existed. It is still sung today by the Jews during their Passover season to express the love and commitment between God and His people. Yet it is literally a love song known to sing of the love of a young couple. Here we are caught by surprised to see how positively God has perceived human’s erotic love, love that enhances and heightens one’s self value through the languages that spoken towards one another in a loving relationship. It is a fantastic song that you could sing to your lover too.   
What are the languages of love that we could find in this passage of the Song? There are four main languages we are going to further elaborate this morning, i.e. languages of admiration (1:15-16a), appreciation (1:16b-17), affirmation (2:1-3a) and appropriation (2:3b).
1.        LANGUAGE OF ADMIRATION (1:15-16A)
V15 and v16 are mutual praises of the couple towards one another, initiated by the man and echoed by the woman. Both have discovered the opposite sex to be beautiful (yāpāh for female, and yāp̄eh for male) in their eyes.  
1.1. INITIATION OF ADMIRATION (1:15)
1:15      How beautiful you are, my darling! Oh, how beautiful! Your eyes are doves.
       Still remember how the exclamation of Adam was when he first saw Eve brought before him? Wow! ‘This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh;’ A bewildered look could be recaptured now in the eyes of the man when he looks at his beloved here. With a cry of ‘hinnāk’ (oh! Ah!), he repeats his praises for her beauty.
       What have captured the whole attention of the man are the eyes of the woman, which are doves (or like doves). Dove is a common animal icons and imagery of lovemaking with the power of seduction. It is perceived by the ancient Near East people as the messenger of love, and Hebrews understands it to denote to the eyes of the woman which are sparkled with dynamics and liveliness.
       People always say that eyes are windows of our souls. Eyes convey our inner intention. A glance from the woman has signalled a deep message of love, and he finds himself lost in the ocean of her love and attractiveness. I believe many have experienced this wonderful feeling of love. It is more than words that could express.         
Admiration usually is the very initial language in a love relationship. Before you love someone, you must find him or her admirable in some aspects. It is important and helpful for the relationship if this sense of admiration is expressed verbally. Love has to be conveyed in a language that could be heard and understood. In this portion of Song, the man takes the initiative to praise the woman. Language of admiration gives strength to a relationship. Men, admire the beauty of your spouses and give your praises as frequent as possible.
1.2  RESPONSE WITH ADMIRATION (16A)
1:16a     How handsome you are, my beloved! Oh, how charming!
Love is never one way express. It needs a corresponding effort to make it workable. Here the woman responds to the praises of man with the same praises she receives from him, echoing her admiration and adoration for her lover (dōwdî, my lover). He is not just handsome, but he is charming (nā‘îm) too in her eyes. He is altogether sweet, lovely and pleasant.
A relationship grows and develops further and deeper if the couple know how to admire one another in a reciprocal manner. Keep on discovering all the positive traits in your spouse or lover, and give your praises unreservedly. Praises sweeten your relationship and normally yield a good response from the other party. Mutual admiration is a good soil for a love relationship to blossom and bear fruits.
2.    LANGUAGE OF APPRECIATION (16B-17)
Here is the woman’s description of their ‘love nest’, constructed in the image of the ‘bed’ and the ‘house/houses’ they share in privacy. With her imaginative mind she sees beyond their current environment, and appreciates the grandness and originality the nature provides for them. Her appreciation speaks of the wonder of love, that love does make all things beautiful and bountiful in the eyes of lovers.  
2.1    APPRECIATE THE NATURE OF WHAT YOU HAVE (1:16B)
1:16b     And our bed is verdant.
Our bed ( ‘arśênūthey) could be a kind of long sleeping chair known as ‘couch’. If we take into consideration of those descriptions narrated in v17, it could mean that the woman is picturing a special bed with bedstead overshadowed by curtain covered on top. Yet from the context we know that the couple is at the countryside and they are actually lying on a greenery ground. Their bed ‘is verdant’ (ra‘ănān) means that it ‘is green, flourishing, leafty or luxuriant’. ‘Verdant’ could be referred to a tree, or leaves of tree that spread under them that contribute to the greenness of their bed.
Women are commonly more sensitive to the environment they are in. While the man’s attention is purely and wholly on the physical beauty of the woman, she notices the surroundings and voices her appreciation. They are not lying on spring bed nor water bed, but bed that is provided by the nature itself. It might not be comfortable, but the woman acknowledges its greenness and sings of her appreciation.  
It seems that what matters to the woman is the time and space to be alone with her lover, and she cares less about the ‘quality’ of their meeting place. Love truly can divert the heart or attention of men and women, from looking not on the imperfection but to the goodness one could discover in his/her environment or situation.
2.2    APPRECIATE THE VALUE OF WHAT YOU HAVE (1:17)
1:17       The beams of our house are cedars; Our rafters are firs.
The woman tells us what kind of ‘house’ they dwell in now. ‘Beams’ are the roofs while ‘rafters’ are the walls. The roofs of their house are actually overarched by those branches of cedars springing above their heads, and the walls of the house are purely interwoven by the trunks of firs surrounding them. They live in a house that is built by the nature itself, the trees of cedars and the firs.
Cedar and firs are wooden materials used by Solomon to construct the temple and the palace. They are considered as the best building materials found on earth. When the woman says that their ‘house’ is made up of cedars and firs, she actually says that their house is the most valuable building of their time, comparable even to the magnificence and majesty outlook of the temple and palace of Solomon. They might not physically dwell in such grand houses, but the value of their house is endorsed and appreciated because of love that dwells in it.
Many couples live in situations where they could not appreciate their living condition, especially when the demands of life are intensified and a sense of competition from the peers set in the picture. Families break down and couples are in conflicts because they see the problems in their environment and shortage in their financial supplies. They are yet to learn to appreciate those small houses they live and those old cars they drive. They are yet to appreciate the nature and value of those possessions they have. The woman’s attitude reminds us that the substance of love itself is far more important and valuable than one could gain from material acquisition. When love is the centre, the language is always positive and appreciative.     
3.    LANGUAGE OF AFFIRMATION (2:1-3A)
There is always a sense of uncertainty and wavering thought that will go through the mind of those loving couples. Questions will surface and one will doubt of one’s worth in another’s eyes. Am I more attractive to him comparing to other girls who seem to be younger and more beautiful than myself? Am I good enough for him? How does he perceive me and what am I linked to? The woman seems to experience this struggle especially she has an issue of inferiority complex. But we see that the problem is solved by the affirmative remarks from her lover. She is able once again to be assured of her worth and re-affirm her love for her lover. Love is a language that affirms and adds on value to lift up the spirit of one another.   
3.1  INVITATION OF AFFIRMATION (2:1)
2:1  I am a rose of Sharon, a lily of the valleys.
In 1:5 the woman has mentioned of her low self-esteem towards her skin colour in comparison to the daughters of Jerusalem. Now she realizes her lowliness once again. She recognizes that she is a country girl without speciality. Roses and lilies are referred to those common flowers that grow on the plain of Sharon or in the valleys. It speaks of her sense of insignificance and unworthiness.
We have to understand that the statement of the woman has actually conveyed a message of invitation, waiting for the reply from her lover. She likes to hear out comments from her man. She is indeed asking her lover to do an assessment and evaluation upon her self-appraisal.
It is a common need especially found in the hearts of many women. Most of them desire to be affirmed by the words and praises from men. Understand the mind of your lover and response well in every invitation that is given to you. Do not be stingy in your words of affirmation, for it has the power to transform the quality of your love relationship.          
3.2  GIVING OF AFFIRMATION (2:2)
2:2  Like a lily among thorns is my darling among the maidens.
The man does not disappoint her. He picks up her self-description and further affirms of her beauty and outstanding position. No doubt she is like a lily, but she is not a lily among the lilies of the valley. In fact she is compared to a lily among thorns. Thorns are useless, unapproachable and unattractive plants. The daughters of Jerusalem might be city girls and they are fair, but in his eyes they are merely thorns and not flowers. His heart is already reserved for his darling, the lily in his eyes.
There is a need to have constant affirmation of love and commitment towards one another for a lasting love relationship. Unanswered doubts bring in instability in the relationship and create more doubts and uncertainties. To love someone, we have to constantly affirm them of who they are to us and how much they mean for us. It is only when we are in love that we are able to discover the hidden beauty of one another, and see some specialities out of mass commonness.
3.3  REWARD OF AFFIRMATION (2:3A)
2:3a   Like an apple tree among the trees of the forest is my lover among the young men.
The woman upon receiving the affirmation from her lover, issues in great joy her affirmation to her lover. To him, she is a lily among the thorns, and to her, he now becomes an apple tree among the forest. He is outstanding and marvellous among his peers. He is identified among the nameless group, a fruit tree in the midst of those trees that bear no fruit. He brings sense of identify and security to her. He is the only one her heart and mind devote to.
Love always functions in a reciprocal manner. To be rewarded you have to work hard in rewarding your partner too. Proverbs tells us that as we refreshed others we will be refreshed. There are ample of opportunities for us to affirm our love ones, and we will find our relationship far more enriching than we could imagine, as we will experience tremendous affirmation too from them.
4.      LANGUAGE OF APPROPRIATION (2:3B)
The greatest language of love is spoken when we allow our lovers to share intimately of what we have. This language of love goes far more than the surface of feelings one has. It is a determination to open oneself and allows the other party to access the inner part, the secret of one’s richness, most probably is the sexual enjoyment between a loving couple. It is the process of withdrawing from and giving to one another as love progresses and matures.
4.1  APPROPRIATION OF HIS SHELTER (2:3B)
2:3b       I delight to sit in his shade,
The OT speaks of shade as an image of protection from the dangers. The man might not be the strongest among all, but he is willing and is able to cover her from the heat of the scorching sun and protect her from the harassment of other men. She finds delight and is secured under the shadow of his wings.
Men are meant to be stronger in physical sense and tend to be able to provide a safe environment for their love ones. Many women find it secured to be in the arms of their husbands or lovers. Be there for your lover and be a pillar of strength she could find support and reliance.          
4.2  APPROPRIATION OF HIS LOVE (2.3B)
2:3b       and his fruit is sweet to my taste.
Upon giving shelter to the woman, the apple tree is meant to provide fruit for her enjoyment. The fruit could denote to the sexual love that the man has which only the woman he loves is entitled to have a rightful appropriation. The fruit is sweet and it nourishes and refreshes the entire being of the woman.
  Love always ends up in unconditional and sacrificial giving. We could imitate the man, giving all he has, leaves for covering, trunk for leaning, ground for resting and fruit for eating. Given the right to appropriate what he has, the woman is satisfied in his love and abundance. Give all you can for your lover and enjoy the sweetness of love you could discover from your lover. That is the greatest wonders one could find in a love relationship.
III.  CONCLUSION
The Song has indeed spoken for us some love languages we could exercise in our intimate relationship with our spouse. Love language always tells of the positive sides of a story and aims to heighten the value of one another, so that both could be benefited and satisfied by the presence and love of one another.  
Speak the languages of love. Admire your love one. Appreciate what you have or what is given to you. Affirm your love for one another. Appropriate what are rightfully yours from one another. Let the love abound and the blessings of God overflow in our midst.
    

Saturday 10 November 2012

Song of Songs 1:15-2:3 (Languages of Love Sung)


(Nov 2012- Song of Songs: Exegesis paper 1:15-2:3)

I. INTRODUCTION
A literary approach will be adopted consistently in interpreting this passage of ‘Song of Songs’ , seeing it as a poem composed and sung, or a drama written and played to communicate a love story between a young couple, accompanied by those expressed intense feelings of desire and love they have towards one another.
Though overall there seems to have a story portrayed in the Song, it is considered not to be in a sequential order. Some of the scenes we encounter within shall be taken as imaginations or fantasies that go through the minds of the couple, as how common lovers usually experience when they are in their passionate moments of love, falling their head over their heels. The figurative and imagery speeches used in forms of either simile or metaphor will be interpreted in accordance with the historical and literal context of the Song itself.
II.   EXEGESIS: SONG OF SONGS 1:15-2:3
The background of 1:15-17 and 2:1-3 is understood to be in the countryside, where the loving couple is free from the crowd to enjoy their private moments together. Many natural metaphors or similes they use (e.g. trees, flowers, valleys, thorns, forest etc) might indicate that they are either under an open air, in the forest, over the green pasture or beside the mountain field. It is said that there is a hint of returning to the naiveté, simplicity, equality and purity of the original couple in the Eden[1].
The Song sings of the wonders of love of a couple, demonstrating a heart of mutual admiration (1:15-16a), simple appreciation (1:16b-17), sincere affirmation (2:1-3a) and rightful appropriation(2:3b) one can have towards love and his/her lover.
1.        SONG OF SONGS 1:15-16A:
SONGS OF MUTUAL ADMIRATION
V15 and V16 are love songs sung by the couple towards one another, in a dialogue form praising each other’s physical beauty, affirming and strengthening their relationship as it grows and develops, with the man focusing on the beauty of the eyes of the woman, and the woman on their private and natural ‘home’ .
The original Hebrew text starts v15 with an emphatic word transliterated as ‘hinnāk’ (‘behold’ or ‘ah’) from the man, paralleled by a corresponding exclamation of ‘hinnəkā’ echoed by the woman, both convey a message of one’s attention being captured by something that is attractive, desirable and admirable. It is noted that a common language of description is used to deliver their mutual love and admiration, expressed by a same Hebrew word used in both feminine (yāpāh, beautiful) and masculine (yāp̄eh, handsome) forms[2].   
1.1. SONG OF SONGS 1:15:                                                 THE MAN INITIATES HIS LANGUAGE OF ADMIRATION
1:15      How beautiful you are, my darling!
Oh, how beautiful!
Your eyes are doves.
According to Murphy, the word ‘hinnāk’ (‘you, indeed’, NIV expresses the terms as ‘how’ and ‘oh’ respectively) carries with it a strong affirmative and melodious effect[3]. Twice the word ‘beautiful’ is used to describe his beloved, and from the overall view of the Song, the praise from the man probably directs towards the physical beauty of the woman, which also speaks of his strong desire over her.
‘My darling’ comes from a Hebrew transliterated word ‘ra‘yātî’ (my friend). She is beautiful and the essence of her beauty is specifically contributed by ‘her eyes’ ( ‘ênayik) which ‘are doves’ (yōwnîm). KJV translates it with the meaning that the woman has the eyes of doves and NAS holds the view that it is probably her eyes are like dove. The uses of metaphor or simile between the eyes and the doves are frequent occurrences found in the Song, referring both to the eyes of the lover and the beloved.
Over centuries, there are many interpretations discovered regarding to the connection between her eyes and doves, arguing from religious, biblical or literary backgrounds and perspectives:
a)                  Doves resemble the image of the Holy Spirit, and they are deemed to possess the characteristics of purity, chastity, humility, modesty, simplicity, sincerity, godliness and innocence[4]. The eyes of the woman might have shone forth these glory and beauty.   .
b)                 It is an abbreviated form of the Song 4:1 ‘your eyes are like doves behind your veil’, corresponding to Jeremiah 48:28 in describing a dove seeking refuge high in craggy rock, and being perceived that her eyes are beautiful and her beauty is too high to be reached by others[5].
c)                  Doves are icons and imagery of lovemaking with power of seduction. They are messengers of love[6]. Her eyes are said to signal her love message to the man. The iconography evidence gathered from ancient Near East shows doves to be symbol of sexuality. ‘You eyes are doves’ could signify a statement like, ‘I find you sexuality attractive.’[7] 
d)                 It could be understood as comparing her eyes with the colour and shape of doves, where most Egyptian arts display this similarity[8]. Or it could refer to her sense of shyness that causes her eyes to be swiftly moving around.    
e)                  Hebrews bases description of body not on its physical sense but the inner substance of dynamic movement and liveliness. There is a possibility that the verse conveys that her eyes are sparkle or gleam[9].
As the Song is written under the ancient Near East and Hebraic context, we can conclude that the image of ‘doves’ relates to the eyes of the woman speaks of her glances of love sparkling with liveliness and vitality, of which the beauty of the eyes accompanied by the love message they deliver have captured the entire heart and being of the man. We could see later in 4:9 the man cries out that one glance of the woman has indeed stolen his heart.

1.2.  SONG OF SONGS 1:16A
THE WOMAN ECHOES WITH HER ADMIRATION
1:16a     How handsome you are, my beloved!
Oh, how charming!
The woman responds to the praises of man with the same praises she receives, echoing her admiration and adoration for her lover (dōwdî, my lover). Adding to the word handsome is a descriptive word ‘charming’ (nā‘îm), which also means ‘pleasant, lovely, sweet and sweet sounding’ etc. The figure of the man appears to be the very intrinsic attractiveness and pleasantness in the eyes of the woman.
2.        SONG OF SONGS 1:16B-17
SONG OF APPRECIATION
After making her praises to the man in a reciprocal manner found in 1:16a, the woman now turns her attention to the ‘bed’ and the ‘house/houses’ they share in privacy. She uses some natural imagery to describe their ‘love nest’. Though it is not structurally constructed and it does not exist physically, the woman sees its grandness and appreciates its originality through her imaginative mind.
This portion of the Song tells us one of the essential elements that we could find in love itself, which is a heart of appreciation. The woman appreciates the moment they are able to be in union of love, and she sings in a language of appreciation towards the surroundings they are in. Love makes all things beautiful and bountiful.  
2.1    SONG OF SONGS 1:16B
1:16b     And our bed is verdant.
Our bed ( ‘arśênūthey) is also translated as ‘our couch’, a kind of long sleeping chair. Hwang sees it as a special bed with bedstead overshadowed by curtain covered on top[10]. If the bed were to be perceived as this, then those details of the bed are described further below, of which the bed is equal to the house/houses mentioned in v17. It is actually not a literal ‘bed’ or ‘couch’ but instead the greenery ground for them to lay down or sleep, as the immediate description ‘is verdant’ (ra‘ănān), which means ‘is green, flourishing, leafty or luxuriant’, most likely refer to a tree[11] in the context of the Bible.
Bed is the most intimate place a couple could have come together, and she appreciates the natural beauty and setting they are in, a place where their love is allowed to blossom and bear fruits. 
2.2    SONG OF SONGS 1:17
1:17       The beams of our house are cedars;
                     Our rafters are firs.
The parallels are found between the lines, where ‘beams’ and ‘rafters’, or ‘cedars’ and ‘firs’ are mentioned, with ‘house’ relates to ‘bed’ in verse 16b. ‘Beam’ (qōwrāh) is referred to the roof while ‘rafter’ (rahîtênū) is referred to the wall. The woman speaks of roofs overarched by the branches of cedars (’ărāzekā) springing above their head and walls interwoven by the trunks of firs (bərōwtîm) surrounding them. Their house/houses (bāttênū) is indeed a descriptive vision of romantic and idyllic love environment[12] beheld in the eyes of the woman. 
Cedar is considered to be the strongest and finest tree found in the forest of Lebanon. It is said to be planted by Yahweh Himself in Psalm 104:16 and is called the tree ‘of God’ in Psalm 80:10. Firs or junipers are plants belong to cypress family. Both cedars and firs are said to be trees that could produce pleasant scent, and they were used by King Solomon massively as materials to build the temple and the palace.
The woman appreciates the ‘house’ they dwell in at that single moment. It is built with the finest materials ever found on the earth, and its majestic and magnificent outlook and substance could be compared to the ingredients found in the temple and palace of Solomon.    
3.        SONG OF SONGS 2:1-3A
SONG OF AFFIRMATION
In 1:5 the woman seems to have low self-esteem towards her skin complexion when comparing herself to the fairness of the daughters of Jerusalem. In 2:1-2 she recognizes her identity as a country girl again, and speaks of her beauty in relating to wild flowers found on the plain of Sharon and in the valleys. The metaphors of a rose and a lily are said to refer to their commonality[13]. The response from the man towards her remarks tells us that her self-appraisal has indeed enhanced by a greater affirmation and praise from her lover. Love is a language that adds on value and lifts up the spirit of one another.   
3.1  SONG OF SONGS 2:1
THE WOMAN’S SELF APPRAISAL
2:1  I am a rose of Sharon,
              a lily of the valleys.
Here the woman does a self-appraisal towards her own physical look and beauty. She considers herself as ‘a rose of Sharon’ and ‘a lily of the valleys’. ‘Rose’ parallels with ‘lily’ and ‘Sharon’ parallels with ‘valleys’. The translation use of indefinite article ‘a’ denotes a sense of commonness of her beauty if compared with definite article ‘the’ which could have been applied[14]. The woman conveys a sense of self-depreciation due to her inferiority complex.
The identification of ‘a rose’ (hăbasselet) and its exact nature have invited many disputes throughout the interpretation history. Most people identify it as crocus (Isaiah 35:1), ‘meadow saffron’, sea daffodil, Tulipa sharonensis or ‘narcissus’, or any other kind of spring flowers, because rose is a late transplant in that region[15]. She is a rose of Sharon, a common girl among many girls who might be more outstanding and beautiful than her.     
Sharon (haššārōwn, of Sharon) is a plain between Mount Carmel and Joppa, and between the coast and the foothills of western Israel, north of Jaffa up to Athlit. It is ‘a fertile, lush plain where browsing flocks eat their fill and become fat.[16]
Some think ‘the lily’ (šōwōšannat) is hyacinth or water lily, but most people refer it to be (blue) lotus which used to be a popular symbol within the region of Syria to Egypt. It is understood from the ancient Egyptian poetry that when the woman calls herself ‘lotus’, she speaks of her power and ability to bestow ‘love sweet breath – a new born life’[17]. When it comes to the season for these flowers to blossom, they will cover all the valleys. The woman refers herself to be just one among the many lilies of ‘the valleys’ (hā‘ămāqî) that spreads its fragrance. This again speaks of her insignificance in the eyes of others.      
3.2  SONG OF SONGS 2:2
THE MAN’S AFFIRMATION TOWARDS THE WOMAN
2.2    Like a lily among thorns
              is my darling among the maidens.
The man picks up her self-description and further affirms of her beauty and outstanding position. No doubt she is like a lily, but she is not a lily among the lilies of the valley. In fact she is compared to a lily among thorns (hōwhîm), which grows in the midst of those most unpromising rocky outcroppings[18].
For him, the rest of ‘the maidens’ (bānōwt, young girls) are just thorns, they are useless, unapproachable and unattractive in his eyes. His heart is fully occupied and reserved for the ‘darling’, the lily in his eyes. The woman stands out to be the extraordinary one among those common girls, most probably are the daughters of Jerusalem whom his beloved has been concerned with. Love opens our eyes to discover the hidden beauty of one another with affirmative words expressed.    
3.3  SONG OF SONGS 2:3A
THE WOMAN’S AFFIRMACTION TOWARDS THE MAN
2.3a       Like an apple tree among the trees of the forest
                     is my lover among the young men.
The woman is assured by her lover of her speciality, and in great rejoice echoes her affirmative remarks towards him. To him, she is a lily among the thorns. To her, the lover is like an apple tree among the young men who are like trees of the forest (ya‘ar). He is an extraordinary man comparing to his young peers. He is a fruit tree, a productive apple tree among the nameless ocean of trees. A commentator illustrates the forest as an inhospitable and dangerous place haunted with wild animals, while the apple tree is a life-enhancing fruit tree[19]. He is tame, safe and sweet while the rest of the men are wild, threatening and tasteless.
Many consider the apple tree (tappūah, which is fragrance) was yet to be found as an agricultural plant in the land of Palestine at the time of the composition of this Song. They refer it to be a citron with an acidic taste, or an orange or lemon tree, or an apricot tree which sends forth an appealing scent[20]. Yet there is another saying confirms that the ancient Mesopotamian, Greeks and Romans knew well and enjoyed apples, and they had associated apples to women and sexuality in their literature writings. Therefore the ancient Israel was deduced to be aware of the apple also[21].
4.        SONG OF SONGS 2:3B
SONG OF APPROPRIATION
The woman celebrates over her enjoyment she has discovered in her lover. He is an apple tree, bearing fruit that is sweet to her taste, and he is also a shelter under the hot and scorching sun. She enters into the stage of appropriation, of sharing something that is his very nature and inner traits. Love is more than merely an outward admiration, appreciation or affirmation through words. It is a real process of enjoying the very personality and property that could be withdrawn from one another as love progresses and matures.
4.1  SONG OF SONGS 2:3B
THE WOMAN ENJOYS HIS COVERING AND PROTECTION
2.3b       I delight to sit in his shade,
In his shade (bəsillōw), could mean under his protection or shadow, which OT speaks of shade as image of protection from the dangers. The apple tree does not actually provide very proper shadow against the summer heat[22]. Yet with the love that he offers, it seems that he is able to cover and protect her from the scorching sun she has been exposed to because of tending the vineyard for her brothers. She has come under his covering and taste of the coolness under the young man. Many other trees might give better shelter, but she is fully satisfied under him.     
4.2  SONG OF SONGS 2.3B
THE WOMAN ENJOYS HIS PROVISION AND STRENGTH
2.3b       and his fruit is sweet to my taste.
Adding on to the benefits of protection and shelter she receives from her lover, the woman is pleased too to enjoy the fruit provided by him. The fruit is sweet or pleasant (mātōwq) to ‘my taste’ (ləhikkî). Since apple is an emblem of sexuality, and the woman is said to taste of his sweetness or goodness, some commentators thus conclude this verse to mean a physical union between the couple. She has indeed reached a stage of satisfaction and fulfilment being alone with her lover.  
III.  CONCLUSION
The passage is a poem of love song that is celebrated and sung among the couple, who have fixed their eyes and gazed upon the beauty and wonders of one another. What they see is the uniqueness found in each other. The nature is a conducive environment for them and even far more comfortable and enjoyable than those beautiful buildings built by the hands of men. They see plants and flowers as a way to express their love and affection, and to heighten one another with praises and words of admiration, appreciation and affirmation. And they truly enjoy the fruit of their love, which they have appropriated to their satisfaction. It is indeed a song of reminder for all who are anticipating for a loving relationship.  








BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barker, Kenneth L. & John R. Kohlenberger III, Ed. The Zondervan NIV Bible
Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1994.

Bruce, F.F. New International Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1979.

Buttrick, George Arthur. The Interpreter’s Bible v5. Nashville: Parthenon Press,
1980.

Carr, G. Lloyd. The Song of Solomon. Leceister: Inter-Varsity Press, 1984.

Davidson, Robert. Ecclesiastes and the Song of Solomon. Louisville: Westminster
John Knox Press, 1986.

Fredericks, Daniel C. & Daniel J. Estes. The Ecclesiastes & The Song of Songs.
Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2010.

Gaebelein, Frank E., Ed. The Expositor’s Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids:
Zondervan Publishing House, 1991.

Garrett, Duane A. The New American Commentary. Nashville: Broadman Press, 1993.

Gledhill, Tom. The Message of the Song of Songs. Taipei: Campus Evangelical
Fellowship Press, 2011.

Hwang, Andrew C.L. Tien Dao Bible Commentary: The Song of Songs. Kowloon:
Tien Dao Publishing Hosue, Ltd., 1997.

Hwang, Andrew & Samuel Goh. Song of Songs. Singapore: Asia Theological
Association, Singapore, 2002.

Keel, Othmar. The Song of Songs. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1994.

LaCocque, Andre. Romance She Wrote. Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 1998.

Longman III, Tremper. Song of Songs: The New International Commentary on the Old
Testament. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2001.

Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible. US: Hendirckson Publishers, Inc,
1996.

Metzger, Bruce M., David A. Hubbard & Glenn W. Baker. Word Biblical Commentary
(23B): Song of Songs/Lamentations. Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2004.

Murphy, Roland E., O. Carm. The Song of Songs. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1990.

Provan, Iain. The NIV Application Commentary: Ecclesiastes/Song of Songs. Grand
Rapids: Zondervan, 2001.

Richards, Lawrence O. The Teacher’s Commentary. Wheaton: Victor’s Books, 1987.

Ryken, Leland & James C. Wilhoit, Tremper Longman III. Dictionary of Biblical
Imagery. Downers Grove: Inter-Varsity Press, 1998.

Walton, John H., Victor H. Matthews & Mark W. Chavalas. The IVP Bible
Background Commentary. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2000.

Weems, Renita J. The New Interpreter’s Bible. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1997.



[1] Kenneth L. Barker & John R. Kohlenberger III, Ed., The Zondervan NIV Bible Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1994), 1029.
[2] Frank E. Gaebelein, Ed., The Expositor’s Bible Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1991), 1221.
[3] Roland E. Murphy, O. Carm, The Song of Songs (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1990), 132.
[4] Matthew Henry’s Commentary on the Whole Bible (US: Hendirckson Publishers, Inc, 1996), 873.
[5] Bruce M. Metzger, David A. Hubbard & Glenn W. Baker, Word Biblical Commentary (23B): Song of Songs/Lamentations (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2004), 147.
[6] John H. Walton, Victor H. Matthews & Mark W. Chavalas, The IVP Bible Background Commentary (Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2000), 577.
[7] Metzger, Word Biblical Commentary (23B): Song of Songs/Lamentations, 147.
[8] Othmar Keel, The Song of Songs (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1994), 69.
[9] Ibid, 69.
[10] Andrew C.L. Hwang, Tien Dao Bible Commentary: The Song of Songs (Kowloon: Tien Dao Publishing Hosue, Ltd., 1997), 136.
[11] Tremper Longman III, Song of Songs: The New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2001), 108.
[12] Duane A. Garrett, The New American Commentary (Nashville: Broadman Press, 1993), 390.
[13] Andrew Hwang & Samuel Goh, Song of Songs (Singapore: Asia Theological Association, Singapore, 2002), 74.
[14] Longman III, Song of Songs: The New International Commentary on the Old Testament,110.
[15] Renita J. Weems, The New Interpreter’s Bible (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1997), 389.
[16] Ibid, 111.
[17] Keel, The Song of Songs, 78-80.
[18] G. Lloyd Carr, The Song of Solomon (Leceister: Inter-Varsity Press, 1984), 88.
[19] Daniel C. Fredericks & Daniel J. Estes, The Ecclesiastes & The Song of Songs (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 2010), 318.
[20] Longman III, Song of Songs: The New International Commentary on the Old Testament,112.
[21] Metzger, Word Biblical Commentary (23B): Song of Songs/Lamentations, 149-150.
[22] Andre LaCocque, Romance She Wrote (Harrisburg: Trinity Press International, 1998), 84.