Friday, 26 October 2012

Romans 2:25-29 What Makes a Real Christian?

(Sept 2012: Romans: Exegesis Paper on Romans 2:25-29)

I.     INTRODUCTION
1.    LITERAL CONTEXT OF/PRIOR TO ROMANS 2:25-29
Paul has been using a diatribe style with a series of questions and answers raised towards a fictional character to address the failure of Jews in keeping the law which is given to them. Though scholars divide themselves about the identity of ‘You’ (singular masculine in Greek) mentioned in verse 1 of chapter 2 (some say he is a moral man, some say he is an individual Gentile, while others indicate that he is a Jew), the subsequent arguments posed by Paul indicating that the most probable person he has in mind and has issued the challenges to is a Jew who takes pride in his religious and national status, and at the same time despises and judges those Gentiles or non-Israelites, considering them as outcast and ‘pagan dogs’ whose moral standards are highly questionable and at stake. In addition to the above literal evidence, a Jew will always tend to believe that all the rest of the human race will be judged by God whereas he himself who is a pious chosen Jew will be exempted[1]. The identification of ‘you…Jew’ in v17 reaffirms a consistent thought pattern and target audience in Paul’s mind when he presents his arguments or statements in chapter 2.
According to Wiersbe, Paul has summoned four witnesses to verify his charge against the guilt of the Jewish nation in the entire chapter 2 and Jews are declared guilty towards his charges[2]. The four witnesses found against the sinful behaviours of the Jewish nation are: a) Jews are found guilty when they judge others as they do exactly what others have done (2:1-3); b) they have misappropriated God’s kindness and mercy, thus stored up for themselves wrath and judgment of God in the end time (2:4-11); c) Jews sin under the law and fail to live up those instructions they have received from the written law and the messages they have preached and taught others. They live a standard far below those Gentiles who are without the written law but are deemed to be righteous because they do the law (2:12-24); d) they are lack of spiritual and inner substances or qualities which qualify them to be true Jews or the children of God, and thus nullify the effect of circumcision upon them (2:25-29).
And it is in this context that Paul points out the message of Romans 2:25-29, directing his audience to understand the true meaning and ultimate purpose of circumcision, the need of keeping and doing the law, and the requirement for being a true Jew, which is to live up to his faith with an inner obedience towards the Lord. With this, he makes a contrast between the disobedience of Jews in v25 and 27 and the obedience of the Gentiles in v26 and v27, highlighting a revolutionary thought that salvation is not by one’s status or privileges given, but by obeying God and His Commandments.            
2.    HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF/PIOR TO ROMANS 2: 25-29
2.1. THE WRITING OF ROMANS
The book of Romans was virtually written during Paul’s stay in the city of Corinth, in the Province of Achaia (refer Acts 20:2-3), with the assistance of an amanuensis Tertius, approximately done around A.D. 55-57[3]. By then Paul was a veteran missionary and minister and his experiences enriched the way he presented the gospel truth to the Church in Rome. With the application of a diatribe style he avoided any unnecessary direct personal offences made to the Romans. Like Paul’s other epistles, Romans was written to a particular audience (Christians in Rome) addressing some of the issues the Church had been struggled and entangled with (refer 2.2 below in section 2).    
Moreover, Paul wanted to be received well by the Romans whom he had never met before, and to clear off some misunderstanding or prejudices they had towards him because of the rumours and untrue news that had been spoken about him. The letter answered some of the doubts and queries the Romans had towards him, e.g. some Jews accused him of preaching ‘antinomianism’ (mentioned in 3: 7-8). Romans serves to clarify Paul’s concept of the Gospel, and he made this known to those Christians in Rome who were converted from traditional Jewish and pagan beliefs, and who had been deep-rooted in their cultural and religious background before they turned to know Jesus Christ and His Gospel.   .            
2.2. THE CHRISTIANS IN ROMANS’ CHURCH
It is believed that the travelling ordinary Christians to Rome for business purposes were those who spread their faith and beliefs with those Jews or pious Gentiles who were attached to Judaism, when they gathered themselves in the synagogues (as synagogue meetings provided the arena for explicit evangelization and debate) during their Sabbaths[4]. The congregation Paul addressed to were composed of Jews and believing Gentiles who were well acquainted with Jewish traditions and beliefs as they had been exposed to these even before the Gospel arrived in Rome.
Though the arguments of the scholars towards whether Paul wrote to a majority of Gentile community or Jewish community vary in numbers, the inner evidence found in the text itself indicates that Paul has both Jewish and Gentile communities in mind, and he approached them with a comprehensive and balance perspective. The tension between Jews and Gentiles believers in Rome is prevalent in the book of Romans as we see how Paul deals with them in the passages.
We could observe a trend that, when Paul deals with Jews, he uses the obedience of Gentiles towards unwritten law to counterattack the disobedience and sinful deeds of Jewish nation towards God and His written law; and while he deals with the issues of Gentiles being saved extensively by the grace of God, he reminds them of the privilege that Jews have received from God and affirms them the eschatological salvation of Jews in God’s plan. Thus both Jews and Gentiles are well expressed and covered in Paul’s perspective and concerns, without partiality or favouritism shown towards any single party, as God is deemed to be just both in His love and wrath, reward and punishment.
In 2:25-29 though Paul seems to direct his argument against Jews, he compares them with the Gentiles in mind, and points out to the ‘self deceived’ Jews the reality of their spiritual condition, in neglecting what the Gentiles have devoted to and emphasized on, the keeping of the law, of which God values.     
2.3. JEWS AMONG THE GENTILE WORLD
Jews consider themselves to be separated from the contaminated world because of their religious practices, especially food law, circumcision and observance of Sabbath etc which are the requirements of the law. But Paul mentions that ‘God’s name is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you’ (2:24), which means God’s name is ‘despised, contempt, disdained, mocked or scorned and valued as nothing’ because the behaviours of Jews have demean the effect of the law as well as the name of God.
Jews are called by God to be ‘a light to the nation’ yet they are badly accused by the Gentile world. Bruce reveals the reasons why God’s name has been blasphemed by the Gentiles, firstly being the sad plight of the Jews in exile to cause Gentiles to mock of the powerlessness and impotence of God in protecting and helping His people (Stott refers to Isaiah 52:5 and Ezekiel 36:22), and secondly being the said then situation of Jews, whose misconduct brings humiliation to God’s name[5]. Transgression of the law by not living in accordance to it is a way of dishonouring God and depriving the honour that is due to Him.
According to Barclay, Gentiles perceive Judaism as ‘uncivilized superstition’, and Jews to be ‘the most horrible people’ and ‘the most despised slaves’ in the world. They accuse Jews to be ‘atheism’ as they see any worship without imagery or idols intolerable. The exclusiveness of Jews towards other religions and their isolation in term of social relationship enhances Gentiles’ enmity towards them.[6]
II.                EXEGESIS ON ROMANS 2:25-29
1.    ROMANS 2:25
(Romans 2:25NIV) Circumcision has value if you observe the law, but if you break the law, you have become as though you had not been circumcised.
It is observed that the passage is in both positive (v25a: Circumcision has value if you observe the law) and negative terms (v25b if you break the law, you have become as though you had not been circumcised) with a contrast word ‘but’ in between. The sentence is attached with two conditional terms ‘if’ and these convey a message of a need to depend on the performance of the audiences[7].
The said Jew will effect the circumcision and bring profits to himself if he obeyed and followed the instructions of the law, but if his deeds were contrasted with the requirements of the law, he indeed breaks the law and he is classified as equivalent to the uncircumcised group, which is the Gentiles. Paul strongly declares that there will not be any religious privilege entitled to a lawbreaker. The status of a circumcised person largely depends on whether he has observed the law.
1.1. CIRCUMCISION
The Hebrew word for the verb ‘circumcise’ is ‘מוּל'’ (mul), first appeared in Genesis 17:10, bearing the meanings of ‘to destroy’, to ‘cut off’ or ‘to wither’. The Greek word for ‘circumcision’ is περιτομ (peritome), and ‘uncircumcision’ is ‘κροβυστία’ (akrobustia). Circumcision is a permanent act of cutting off or removing the foreskin of a male’s penis.[8] It is understood to be ‘the act of circumcision, the state of being circumcised or those who have been circumcised.’[9]  
Byrne sees the act of circumcision more than a human physical condition, but is used to distinguish between the communities of Jews (the circumcised) and the Gentiles (the uncircumcised)[10]. Yet in the ancient times, circumcision is a common practice found among the neighbouring nations of Israel, i.e. Egypt which is said to be the first nation practicing custom of circumcision. But Jews see circumcision as a unique sign and seal for them and it has to do with the historical development of this practice.     
Jews for centuries have considered circumcision as a covenantal act and sign made between God and their forefather, Abraham. This everlasting covenant with promise and grace was initiated by God towards Abraham and his descendants and the generations to come, and was broadly narrated in Genesis 17:1-27. In this Abrahamic covenant, God gave Abram a new name ‘Abraham’, and he was promised to be the father of many nations, who would be fruitful and have kings as his descendants. They would possess the land of Canaan where Abraham used to be an alien to it. Abraham and his descendants after him and the generations to come were to keep this covenant in responding to the commandment of God to circumcise every male in their communities (inclusive of those servants, slaves and foreigners who live among their community).
Since then, every Jewish boy is obliged to follow the tradition and be circumcised on the eighth day after he is born (Leviticus 12:3), and with the mark of circumcision, they are identified as the people of God.[11] Whoever does not circumcise in the flesh will be viewed as unclean and will be cut off from his people, and will be rendered as breaking God’s covenant with him. During the reign of Greeks, The disdain of the Greeks towards circumcision intensified the desire of the Jews to uphold the practice of circumcision. Since Maccabean Revolt in the second century, circumcision has become the basic expression of Jewish’s religion and nationality[12]. The practice of circumcision goes into extreme when they will circumcise for the dead babies who die before their eighth day, even to the extent of opening the tomb and circumcise those who were buried when their bodies were found yet to be decomposed[13].  
Jewish teachers and scribes devote themselves in promoting the practice. In Acts 15:1, certain Judaizers came down to Antioch and teach that ‘unless you are circumcised, according to the custom taught by Moses, you cannot be saved.’ It is further emphasized by the effort done by Pharisees when they ‘travelled over land and sea’ and entered the synagogues to persuade the God-fearers to circumcise in order to become full proselytes[14]. Even the saying found in the Talmud denies law’s effectiveness upon those Gentiles who observe it without going through circumcision. The illustration of the author of Jubilees has conveyed vividly and fully the importance of circumcision means to the Jews, that:
‘And anyone who is born whose own flesh is not circumcised on the eighth day is not from the sons of the covenant which the Lord made for Abraham since (he is) from the children of destruction. And there is no sign upon him so that he might belong to the Lord because (he is destined) to be destroyed and annihilated from the earth and to be uprooted from the earth because he has broken the covenant of the Lord our God.’ (Jubilees 15:26)[15].
The Jews see circumcision as a seal to guarantee for their salvation, and they perceive they have a definite share in the world to come. The Jewish tradition relates Abraham sitting at the gate of Gehenna (a place outside ancient Jerusalem known as the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, or called hell, which is a destination for the wicked) to forbid the circumcised Jews to enter it. It is taught in the Rabbinic epigrams that circumcision will deliver Israel from Gehenna and the Jews have superstitious belief in this.[16] The greatest insult in Judaism is to call a Jew uncircumcised one[17]. 
1.2. THE LAW
The law (Greek: νόμον, transliterated as ‘nomon’) here is synchronized to the ‘written code’ found in v29. It is mainly referred to Mosaic Law (the Torah in Hebrew) which was written and passed down to the generations of the people of Israel. The Law was given to the people of Israel on Mount Sinai before Israelites started the journey of wilderness. Leon Morris agrees that it is a word frequently mentioned in Romans, and with its 72 occurrences, there are 51 times the term is best understood of as the Mosaic Law[18].
The Law serves as a guide for the community of Israel in her relationship to God, to her fellow brothers and to the outsiders. It lays down Israelites’ uncompromised religious responsibilities towards God as well as their social obligations. It has indeed successfully established and identified her nationality. But when the Israelites had settled themselves in the land of Canaan, they deviated themselves from the commands of God and turned to the worship of Idols, following all kinds of detestable practices of the pagans and allowed themselves to be defiled through their disobedience towards the Law given to them.
The Law resumed it supreme status in the community of Israel, after they had been afflicted by the experience of seventy years of the exile in Babylon since 586B.C. Most of the Jews of that period believed in the teachings and proclamation of prophet Jeremiah and Ezekiel, that they had broken the covenant made with God on Mount Sinai, and was thus entitled to the sufferings and humiliation. When the remnant of Israelites returned to the land of Judah, they refused any involvement in idolatry and they devoted themselves in observing the law so that their relationship with God would be restored. It is recorded in the book of Ezra and Nehemiah that the Law was read to the hearing of the people of God, and they were moved with tears of repentance. When Jews were greatly affected by the Hellenistic cultural influences, they clung on to the law as the sign of themselves being the chosen people of God. Law separates the Jews from their surrounding world with their different life-styles.[19]  
Jews usually boast of their sole possession of the law as the Word was entrusted to them from the one true God[20]. In the Jewish literature Jews proudly declare before God,
‘In you we have put our trust, because, behold, your law is with us, and we know that we do not fail as long as we keep your statues. We shall always be blessed; at least, we did not mingle with the nations. For we are all a people of the Name; we, who received one Law from the One. And that Law is among us will help us, and that excellent wisdom which is in us will support us.’(2 Bar 48:22-24, OTP 1:636)[21]
 From the above, we understand the relationship between Jews and circumcision, and between Jews and the law, and how they have placed their trust in the Abrahamic and Mosaic covenants and neglect that the blessings promised by the covenant depend on their relationship with God. Paul has argued that the disobedience of the Jews nullifies the law given to them and their transgression of it has nullified the circumcision too[22].  
1.3. CIRCUMCISION AND THE LAW
There is a close relationship between the value and effectiveness of circumcision and the law which is supposed to be observed by the Jews. Verse 25 demonstrates for us the unbreakable connection between the value of circumcision and the observance of the Law. We understand from James 2:10 telling us that, ‘For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it.’ Ernest Kasemann concludes that, ‘the Jew who transgresses the law denies both his circumcision and the commandment of Scripture which directs it.’[23]
It is stated by Everett F. Harrison that circumcision is the second major distinctive of Jews followed by the law.[24] To Jews, to circumcise is equivalent to obeying all the commandments, and it seems that Jews in Paul’s time or at least in Roman Church emphasize the importance of circumcision but neglect the importance of practicing law. Paul raises an opposite perspective from Jews, insisting that circumcision is only valuable if one obeys the law. He goes deeper into directing the focus of Jews, making them understand that inner obedience is far more pleasing to God than the outward conformation.
For the Jewish audience, they might misunderstand Paul’s intention, as Paul seems to be against circumcision. But Paul does see the value of circumcision, and recognize its covenantal significance, but it will only has value (Greek: φελεōphelei’, translated as of value or profits) if the law is observed. Paul is making clear that ritual performances amount to nothing if there is no genuine obedience towards the commandments of God shown in His Scripture. Galatians 5:3 tells specifically that those who are circumcised are obligated to obey the whole law.
1.4. OBSERVE OR BREAK THE LAW
‘Observe’ (Greek: φυλάσσ ‘phylassē’) is translated as ‘keep’ or ‘guard’. ‘Break’ (Greek: παραβάτης ‘parabatēs’) is translated in NAS and INT as ‘a transgressor’. The same word is used in James 2:11. When Paul uses this presumptive statement of ‘but if you break the law’, he has indeed the previous verses of 2:21-24 in mind, when Jews (though not all Jews are guilty of the charge) are questioned by Paul about their religious integrity, honesty and genuineness towards, for they steal, commit adultery, rob temples and break the law. ‘Has become’ (Greek: γέγονεν, gegonen), also known as ‘took place, has done, was done, come to pass, had happened’ etc, is a perfect tense verb signifies the complete of an action and the associated result is in a final and settled condition. The result of their misconduct has rendered their circumcision void. Dodd confirms that ‘there is evidence showing the terrible degradation of Jewish moral in the period preceding the destruction of the Temple.’[25]  
2. ROMANS 2:26
2:26 So then, if those who are not circumcised keep the law’s requirement, will they not be regarded as though they are circumcised?
It is based on the above arguments that Paul raises another question in v26. If the above statement in v25 about circumcised Jews were true, then the following presumption for uncircumcised Gentiles will be valid as well. The sentence is qualified by a similar conditional term ‘if’ found in v25. Again, the status of ‘those uncircumcised’ depends on their performance too. With this statement, Paul is making clear that keeping the law (or obeying God’s commands) entitles one to be considered as the chosen people of God, whether he is circumcised or not circumcised. But to Jews, this is unthinkable and it is contrary to what they have believed in, as they see circumcision as an indispensable part of keeping the law. Paul’s argument is a new insight for them to be grasped.
‘So then’ (ον ‘oun’) is used to link the argument mentioned in v25. It is translated as ‘then, so, therefore’ etc. Contrasted to the above assumptive situation of Jews is the probable situation of Gentiles (the uncircumcised) who do not have what the Jews have (the sign of circumcision and the promise of salvation), but who do what the law requires of them (knowingly or unknowingly), and they are entitled to the religious status which Jews claimed to be absolutely and exclusively theirs. Therefore they are to be reckoned as a member of the people of Israel.
Cranfield explains the phrase ‘keep the law’s requirement’ as to mean ‘not a perfect fulfilment of the law’s demands’ but ‘a grateful and humble faith in God and the life turned in the direction of obedience which is its fruit.’[26] Since no man has ever been perfect in doing the law except Jesus who is the embodiment of the law himself, and it is impossible for ordinary men to keep the full statues of God, Paul definitely will not perceive that the Gentiles are able to do so. But he is referring to a heart or inner condition, of one who is sincere in his faith and has repented from his own sin. A Gentile who is willing to humble himself and obey what the law says and requires of him is regarded (Greek: λογισθήσεται ‘logisthēsetai’, translated also as will be reckoned, be counted, be computed, be calculated and be put into one’s account etc) as circumcised and is thus qualified to be classified as God’s people.
3. ROMANS 2:27
2:27 The one who is not circumcised physically and yet obeys the law who condemn you who, even though you have the written code and circumcision, are a lawbreaker.
In the previous two verses, Paul recognizes the possibility of Gentiles to be considered as people of God or member of Israel if they keep the law requirement. Now he adds on to the pain of prideful Jews the eschatological possibilities where Gentile believers who obey the law shall condemn them. Condemn (Greek: κρίνει ‘krinei’) is translated as ‘judge’ in most of the versions and in other occurrences. Robertson explains that ‘condemn’ does not mean that the Gentiles bear the responsibility of judging ‘uncircumcised’ in the end but that Gentiles will be the eye-witnesses when God executes His judgment. Though Gentiles will not judge Jews in divine sense, yet despite of their current inferiority, they will supersede Jews in status and they will co-judge with God[27].   
Jews entitle the privilege of being chosen as a nation for God’s purpose to work through the salvation for the nations. As they are chosen for salvation prior to the Gentiles, they too are liable to be judged prior to the Gentiles. This two fold primacy for the people of Israel is taught by the prophets of God.[28] We found that in Romans 2:6-11, Paul clearly lays down the definite reward for those who do right in the eyes of God and judgment for those who deviate from the path of God, regardless of their nationality and religious status. The judgment and reward according to Paul, is first to the Jews, then to the Gentiles. 
Yet Jews have such national and ethnic pride that they wrongly perceive that their religious status will serve them as an exemption from the eschatological judgment of God.[29] In the wisdom literature, Jews are told that the Gentiles will be punished severely by God for their wickedness whereas they themselves will receive some remedies if they have sinned against God.[30] Justine Martyr proclaimed that Jews are the descendants of Abraham, and they will have a share of eternal kingdom even if they were sinners who do not believe God and rebel against God.[31]
Paul shocks Jews with such statement that those Gentiles (who obey the law) they despise and regard as outsider for the promises and blessings of God, are not only to be entitled to the glory of the kingdom, but also to condemn them. With double protections (circumcision and written code) they think they have possessed, and the hope of eternal redemption with the authority to co-judge with God on the Gentiles, Jews’ destiny is instead reverted and they are deemed to be helpless in the face of judgment, and they are placed in an inferior status comparing to the obedient Gentiles. Written code (Greek: γράμματος ‘grammatos’) means also ‘letter’ and it refers to the written law which is Torah, but they are some who interpret it as another meaning for ‘circumcision’ in literal sense.    
John the Baptist has openly rebukes those Pharisees and Sadducees, the spiritual elites of his day about their rottenness and unrepentant hearts. They are told to produce fruits in keeping with repentance or else they shall experience wrath of God. The Pharisees and Sadducees though have special privileges in their religious status, and claim themselves to have Abraham as their father, are evitable encountering God’s judgment because of their sinful acts. Jesus in Matthew 12:41-42 also makes a remark that the Nineveh who repented and the Queen of Sheba who travelled from afar to listen to Solomon’s wisdom shall rise in the judgement day to condemn the nation of Israel.    
The same is with the Jew Paul is referring here to. The Jewish nation could not rely on the credit of their forefathers, instead each and every one of them has to be accountable before God of his own deeds and claim his own ground for pardon. The Jews need to learn the truth that God does not show favouritism and He is just to carry out His judgment upon all men.
4.      ROMANS 2:28
2:28 A person is not a Jew who is one only outwardly, nor is circumcision merely outward and physical.
John Stott points out that Paul makes a series of fourfold contrast when redefines for Jews what it means to be a Jew, which is found in v28 and v29: a) the contrast between outward and inward Jews; b) the contrast between circumcision of the flesh and of the heart; c) circumcision is effected by the Spirit and not the written code, the law; and d) Praise from God and not from men.[32]
Paul uses a double negative phrases ‘not’ and ‘nor’ (Greek: οδoude’) to deny the general concept and understanding Jews have commonly held in regard to their national, ethnical and religious identity. A Jew is not what he supposes who he is, an outward follower of the traditional or ritual forms and rules. And to Paul’s understanding, circumcision is not what is perceived by Jews, only an act that is outward and physical. He is directing them further into v29, showing them something more than their physical experiences, something they yet to discover, concerning their inner relationship with the One and Only God they worship.
4.1. JEW
‘Jew’ (in Greek is ουδαος, transliterated as ‘Ioudaios), occurs 13 times in the New Testament, in the books of John and Acts and the epistles written by Paul. In the Gospel of John, the term refers to those who possess traditional Jewish thought and who are in opposition to Christ Jesus and his revolutionary teachings based on the Law of Moses; and in the book of Acts they are mainly those people who persecute the church, the apostles and hinder the advancement of the gospel.[33] In Paul’s epistles, Jews are referred to those who come against the apostolic teaching of Paul and his missionary endeavours. Ronald understands ‘Jews’ used in Paul’s letters commonly denotes to their nationality and religion status (those who are followers of Judaism), and they are well-known with their proclamation of monotheism. ‘Jews’ is an honourable title and the name itself automatically separates them from the rest of the world[34]. 
 Wuest makes a definition for the three titles given to Jews: First is Hebrew which differentiates a Hebrew-speaking Jew form a Greek-speaking one; Second is Jew which distinguishes a Jew from a Gentile with the sense of his nationality, and lastly is Israelites which reveals the fact that Jew is a member of the theocracy and an heir of promises given in Abrahamic covenant[35]. According to Gutbrod, ‘Jew’ is a common term used for Hebrew people by pagans and was later adopted by the Jewish people, and carried with it both subjective cultural or emotional connection towards their nationality and monotheistic religion.[36]
4.2. OUTWARD AND PHYSICAL
Paul points out the actual situation of the Jews by stating of what they do have outwardly (v28) and what they do lack inwardly (v29). ‘Outwardly’ (in Greek the term is ν (en), τ () φανερ (phanerō), literally translated as ‘outwardly the/who outward’, it indicates a range of meanings like, ‘in the open’, ‘visibly’, ‘apparent’, ‘manifest’ ‘evident’ and ‘known’[37], referring to those parts that are exposed to others and can be observed from the outside. Jews practice the traditional teaching of circumcision, and they try to fulfil their calling through conforming to the works of the law, yet their performance is merely outward and physical (ν (en) σαρκ (sarki), which means ‘in flesh’) with outer forms but without inner substance and obedience.
5.    ROMANS 2:29
2:29 No, a person is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is circumcision of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the written code. Such a person’s praise is not from other people, but from God.
5.1. INWARDLY
Inwardly (Greek: ν (en), τ () κρυπτ (kryptō)) means ‘in secret’, denotes to areas where people cannot see initially with a glance of physical eyes but only God can access and know. Definitely, a man who is Jew inwardly will gradually manifest God’s character and nature and his faith will be firmly established.
A Jew inwardly is expressed as ‘A Jew to the eyes of the One before whom the secrets of men’s heart and lives are an open book.’[38] It speaks about his honesty, openness, transparency, integrity and decency etc. Only those who seek to live a righteous life at right with God are able to be like an open book to be read by God. A Jew is inwardly when there is nothing that he does or he desires displease God, and he relates to God in a personal and intimate level.
5.2  CIRCUMCISION OF THE HEART BY THE SPIRIT
The teaching of circumcision of the heart is first found in the book of Deuteronomy where exhortation comes to Israelites to ‘Circumcise your hearts, therefore, and do not be stiff-necked any longer.’ (Deuteronomy 10:16). Deuteronomy 30: 6 comes again with the promise that, ‘The LORD your God will circumcise your hearts and the hearts of your descendants, so that you may love him with all your heart and with all your soul, and live.’ The former verse talks about the obedient act men should have in responding to God’s commands and the later verse speaks about God’s empowerment towards generations of Israelites that they will experience God’s help to live a life of obedience. We can see that it takes both sides to live to God’s demand. It tells us that God demands an inner circumcision, which is the removal or cutting off of impurity in our hearts, more than just a physical or outwards cutting off of the foreskin of a penis.
The prophet Jeremiah urges his contemporary fellow countrymen to ‘Circumcise yourselves to the Lord, circumcise your hearts, you men of Judah and people of Jerusalem…’ (Jeremiah 4:4). His exhorts them so that they could avoid the wrath of God because of their evil practices in idolatry. Jeremiah 9:25 is bluntly clear about God’s punishment shall fall upon ‘all who are circumcised only in the flesh.’
Paul in Philippians 3:3 admits that, ‘For it is we who are the circumcision, we who worship by the Spirit of God, who glory in Christ Jesus, and who put no confidence in the flesh’. In Colossians 2:11 he reminds Colossians that they have been circumcised in Christ and put off of the sinful nature. This circumcision is not done by men’s hands but by Christ. It is a circumcision of the heart by the Spirit.
Thus, we can conclude that the Bible is consistent in telling us the requirements of God for each and every one of us who claim to be His followers, that He demands our inner submission, a heart that is pure, without any worldly contamination and pollution, a heart that is devoted wholly for His purpose. What he asks is more than our outward performances and conformity. Circumcision is more than circumcision of the flesh, but it is accompanied by a circumcision of the heart. A heart that makes room and make vacant for His infilling and replenishment.
5.3. PRAISE
‘Praise’ (Greek: παινος ‘epainos’) could be translated as ‘worthy of praise’, ‘praiseworthiness’ or ‘fame’. From the Bible we know that Judah’s name means ‘praise’ and his mother Leah praises God after giving birth to them and names him ‘Judah’. The word ‘Jew’ derives from the word ‘Judah’ which means ‘praised’.   
Barclay refers to Genesis 29:35 & 49:8, revealing to us the double meanings which are found in the word ‘praise’ in its original and traditional way, that it literally means ‘praise’ comes from God rather than from men, and those characteristics possessed by Jews do not originate from men but from God. Therefore the promises of God is not given to a particular nation, nor to those who have the mark of covenant, but to those who preserve the standard of living dictated by God in His living Word (which is to live up the truth of God)[39].
Jews are experts of self-praising, because they think themselves higher than the rest of the human race, and because they are uniquely chosen by God to be His people as a nation. In Romans 2:17-20, Paul has pointed out the pitfalls of Jews who are overconfident about themselves, setting themselves as a guide for the blind, a light for those in the dark, an instructor of the foolish and the teacher of infants. Yet they are not who they think they are, indeed they are lost, blinded, foolish and are nobody but mere infants.
In the New Testaments, we see Jesus deals with the Pharisees and scribes about their problems of seeking recognition and praises of men as they regard themselves righteous, holy and honourable (Matthew 23:6-7). It has always been Jesus’ teaching to direct the Jews to indeed praise God and to allow others to give praises to God because of their good deeds. Paul teaches the Jew here that, if he wants to be a true Jew, praise must come from God, for it is only God who is able to establish him for who he is.
III.             LITERAL CONTEXT AFTER 2:25-29
After making certain contrasts between circumcision and uncircumcised, and conclude about what makes a Jew, Paul goes on to reinstate and reaffirm the value and advantages of circumcision and being a Jew with a strong emphatic statement ‘Much in every way!’, and he explains that the main reason is that, Jews are entrusted with the words of God (Romans 3:1-2). They are the first who possess the oracle of God among the nations.
The teaching of Old Testament is not nullified based on what Paul has based his arguments above, and God’s promises are still valid and sound. Jews lost their privilege and status not because God is unfaithful, but because they are unfaithful towards the mandate that is entrusted to them. They are supposed to be proclaiming God’s truth among the nations, and be used as a channel through whom the light of Christ will be shine forth throughout the end of the earth. Yet they have rejected the very truth that is given to them.
IV.  CONTEMPORARY & HOMILETIC APPLICATION
From the argument of Paul about what makes a Jew and what does circumcision mean , we could draw from within the passage some principles to be applied in our daily walk with God, to ensure that what we do please God and our faith is counted as genuine. The below points remind us about the concluded theme: ‘WHAT MAKES A REAL CHRISTIAN?’
1.    A COMMITMENT TO LIVE OUR LIVES INSIDE OUT (V25-26, V28-29)
Like the Jews in Paul’s time (in the Romans’ setting), there are always two groups of people we have in the church, those who boast of their inner encounter and spiritual status in God, and those who boast of their ministry performances and works for the Lord. We are always being tossed about in a dilemma. We believe that we are saved by the grace of God and good works do not contribute anything to our salvation. Yet we are reminded again and again by the Word that we are to live a life that is worthy of our salvation, to serve God unreservedly so that we may live and receive blessings and avoid judgment and wrath of God. We need to be constantly reminded that God looks for an inner attitude of obedience in relationship to Him which produces piety and holiness when we live and relate with others.
1.1. RELIGIOUS PRACTICES AND STATUS WITHOUT INNER OBEDIENCE ARE USELESS (V25, V28)
Jews’ temptation to rely on circumcision to be the ground for their salvation is our temptation as Christians too this day. Their experiences remind us to avoid two extremes, one is to rely on our spiritual status as Christians and neglect the spiritual substances that God requires of us, and the other is to devote ourselves in religious practices without genuine love and relationship with God.
There is a teaching and belief held by Christians called ‘antinomianism’, which indirectly has promoted sin because it believes in ‘Sola Fide’, that ‘faith alone’ is enough to sustain the Christianity walk and there is no need to practice moral laws. This is definitely not what Paul is teaching. Instead Paul accepts the importance of circumcision and redefines its scope, to reinstate that it is not just a physical act that one has to go through, but an inner act out of obedience to God which adds on to it the true value. Therefore as Christians we should always be reminded that we are not to misuse the grace of God, and rely entirely on our ‘spiritual status’ (which is saved by grace through faith), but to commit ourselves to His way, to be serious in our personal walk with God and let Him circumcise our innermost, so that we can lead a consistent lifestyle that is inside out. At the same time, we shall remember that true spiritual experiences ultimately will be manifested and seen in our speech and deeds. Christianity is a life and not just a concept of belief.
Many of us depend on outer activities and ritual performances to justify our faith in God. We observe Sabbath by going to Sunday Service, giving tithes, taking communion and serving in the church, thinking that while we are fulfilling these outer tasks instructed in the Bible, we could please God and we are ‘safe’ from eternal destruction. Yet we might neglect to obey the Great Commandments to love God and to love others as how we love ourselves. We might not relate with God in a personal way to allow Him to renew us and to mould us in accordance with His purpose and design, to direct us our path and to use us to whatever the extent He desires, and we might not have compassion towards the needy, the broken and the hurtful.
There are evidences showing us that some Christians are no different from the world in our social conduct and approaches. We do not do God and others justice as we are supposed to do so; we prioritize our personal agenda and profits before God and our neighbours; and we hurt others with our tongues, and we mistreat those whom God has placed under our care and concern. We heard of ministers and church leaders who deprive the rights of the congregations and who are involved in adultery or financial misappropriation. Yet we think that God is gracious and He would allow us to go heaven even if we keep on sinning. Sometimes we overlook little sins and think that God does not mind these.
Jesus rebukes Pharisees and scribes as those who clean the outside layer of the cup without bothering the inside. True obedience is an inside out process. Just like circumcision is effected with law observance, our religious forms and activities are effected only if we obeyed God in our innermost. Breaking a portion of the law is equal to breaking of the entire law.
We need to keep in mind that though we are saved by grace, we are saved for good works in Christ Jesus as told by Paul in Ephesians 2:8-10. There is a purpose for every religious rite and form we are told to conform to, either in our church or in the society, but the bottom line is that we have to obey God, doing what He instructs us to do in accordance to His living Word.
1.2. INNER OBEDIENCE SUPERSEDES OUTWARD FORMS AND RITES
(V26, 29)
As what is mentioned by Paul in v26, the uncircumcised is credited as circumcised because they keep the law. V29 reaffirms that a Jew is one who is inwardly with circumcision of the heart. God’s kingdom is open to receive all, and only those who are obedient and willing to follow Him are able to find the way of the entrance and become the children of God. In Jesus’ time there are many outcasts in the society who are rejected by many and are considered as hopeless and undesirable, Jesus receives them all because they have genuine trust and obedience towards the calling and teaching of Him.
There is no spiritual elite or privilege in the Kingdom of God. Though it is stated by Paul that salvation shall be given first to Jews, then to Gentiles, and judgment first to the Jews, then to the Gentiles, we have to understand that it is the sequence of God’s salvation plan but never His favouritism in choosing who is to be saved.
The Church and Christians tend to think that we as Christians have special privilege as we are the saved ones, the holy sages and a heavenly community. If we are not careful, we might fall as how the Jews fell, believing that only they are spiritual elites and are entitled to the Kingdom of God. If we do not understand the heart of God, we will disassociate ourselves from the fallen world and linger around only with holy Christians and focus only discussing and talking about our ‘spiritual inheritance’, which is the Word of God, our spiritual encounters and our eternal salvation. Yet we forgot that God’s heart is for the majority out there, in the darkness, in the pit and in the wilderness.
A Church is a Church not because it has a building or organisation, but because of its mission and vision in reaching out to the lost. A Christian is called a Christian because of his faith and love for God and for the souls. The church and the Christian shall always access to the heart of God and do what Jesus says to us, to care for the needy, to bring healing to the sick and to usher in deliverance to those in the bondage and sin. If God looked down on from heaven to the Church and His people, He looks for true worshippers who cry for the souls rather than programs and celebration without genuine repentance and concern for the lost world. Church is warmed up by the love she has for the Lord and the people.
2.      AN AWARENESS TO LIVE TOWARDS ESCHATOLOGY(V27, V29)
As Christians, we are called to more than living on this life, but the life to come. We build and accumulate treasure not on earth but on heaven. Yet the contemporary teachings found within the Christian circles emphasize more of blessings we could receive on this life than the eternal rewards we could entitle to in life to come.
We shall always bear in mind that our life is not limited to this earthly living, but our lives are prepared for eternity, and there is a day when each and every one of us has to come before God to be accountable for our lives on this earth. The Day of Judgment will surely come upon everyone of us, regardless of our nationality and our ethnicity. The good and faithful will be rewarded and the evil ones and the wicked will be punished by God.  
2.1. THE DISOBEDIENT WILL BE JUDGED
God is just and He shows mercy but no favouritism. If we lived our lives carelessly without taking our mission on earth seriously, and if we disobeyed God and worked against His purpose and will, and lived a wanton lifestyle without getting ourselves right with God or with others, we will tend to receive punishment from God. We will be judged accordingly and there is no discount or turning back.
Our spiritual status, like Jews, does not exempt us from judgment of God. Whoever are righteousness in God’s sight will co-judge with God, and be those witnesses in our heavenly trial. It will not be surprise if we are called the wicked and evil-doers in the end when we meet God, if our hearts or motives were not right when we serve God or if we failed to relate to Jesus personally. Jesus will deny us and those whom we might think inferior to us in term of spirituality and status in the church might be the co-judge in the end time, condemning us before the throne of God.   
2.2. THE OBEDIENT WILL BE PRAISED
The day will come when everything will be revealed. There is nothing we could hide from God. He will tell us whether our faith is genuine and if our deeds are out of our sincere love towards Him. Paul says a Jew (a real Christian) receives praise from God.
Often we seek praises from men, in order that we could be affirmed and appreciated, valued and honoured. But men’s praises add nothing to us and indeed are vanities. Only God’s praise gives us significances as it assures us of who we are. Jesus teaches us also to seek the praises from the Father, where we will be called ‘good and faithful servant’ the day we are in heaven. The early praises pass away without adding any eternal values, but praises from God determines our destiny and rewards.
Seek therefore to live a life with eschatological perspective, bearing in mind that the Day will come and we aim to receive praises and reward from God. It is this determination and endeavour that will keep us moving forward in the right direction and receive our eternal crown and possession in heaven.  
3.      A COMPLETE RELIANCE ON THE SPIRIT OF GOD (V29)
It is impossible for us to live a holy life in obedience to God with our pure human desire and determination. Paul has mentioned the helplessness of men trying to live up what he aims to live in Romans chapter 7, and he knows that though his heart is willing but his flesh is weak. It is futile if we try to live up to the standard of God with our own knowledge and efforts.
How many times we make resolutions in the beginning of a new year but fail in the end to not even accomplish one third of our plans? How many times we know that we should speak the truth in love, yet we have lied to, we have stolen away and we have killed someone with our tongues and words, either knowingly or unknowingly? How many times we determine to love our neighbours but end up loving more of ourselves? How many times we long for a renewal but end up dry and lifeless?
Going to Church will help us know more about bible knowledge and Christianity phenomena; joining cell groups frequently will help us get to know more friends and have more prayer and moral supports, serving God diligently might give us a sense of false peace, thinking that we are right with God and our spiritual walk is still in line with God. But all these do not guarantee a genuine change and transformation in our character and life. We cannot become holier with mere human efforts. A Christian is changed and transformed when he is succumbed to the Spirit of God, filled with the Spirit and walk in obedience in the Spirit.
God has promised in His Word that the Holy Spirit will be sent to dwell in us so that we are empowered to live a victorious and holy life that we suppose to live. Romans 8:15-16 says that we receive the Spirit of sonship and the Spirit testifies with our spirit that we are God’s children, and God is our Father. We are able to imitate our heavenly Father through the power of the Spirit. The Spirit is sent to equip and transform us. He convicts us of our own sin and leads us into the righteousness of God.
V.    CONCLUSION
Paul is exerting himself with lengthy arguments and words to try to bring the Jews of his days to come to their senses. Jews are indeed involved in a great spiritual crisis and trouble. Yet they are still confident of who they are and what will become of them. Paul brings out the facts and tells them not to remain ignorant for who they are and how their spiritual condition is, but to have a thorough and serious self-check and understand their own spiritual plights. They need a genuine repentance, they need circumcision not of the flesh but of the heart, by the Spirit of God, so that they could possess true faith that lies not on their spiritual or traditional inheritance, but to rely on the Spirit of God and a heart that turns fully onto the Lord, the Savior, Christ Jesus.
As Christians, we learn from the example of the fictional role that Paul speaks against. We too are not to be too confident of our flesh, or to rely on our efforts to receive heavenly rewards after our salvation. Instead, we should fix our eyes on Jesus and tap on the power of the Spirit for a life renewal and transformation, and to lead a life that gear towards eschatological praises and reward, that at the end when we see God face to face, we are welcomed and recognized as ‘good and faithful servants’.
And above all else, we need to be constantly refreshed in our mind the task ahead of us, which God has entrusted to us, to be the light unto the nation illuminated by the power of the Spirit, to spread the good news of Jesus Christ, to witness of His awesome presence through His Word and His Works, and to be used by God as vessels to usher in people of all nations.




BIBLIOGRAPHY

Arnold, Clinton E. Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary. Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 2002.

Barclay, William. The Daily Study Bible: The Letter to the Romans, Translator: Dr Timothy
Chow. Hong Kong: Chinese Christian Literature Council Ltd.

Barrett, C.K. A Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. London: Adam & Charles
Black, 1979.

Benson, Richard Meux. An Exposition of the Epistle of St. Paul to the Romans. New York:
J. Pott and Co., 1892.

Bruce, F.F. Romans. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002.

Burrows, W. The Preacher’s Complete Homiletic Commentary on the Epistle of St. Paul the
Apostle to the Romans. New York: Funk & Wagnalls Company.

Byrne, Brendan, S.J. Sacra Pagina Series 6: Romans. Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 2007.

Cranfield, C.E.B. Romans: A Shorter Commentary. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans
Publishing Company, 1992.

Dodd, C.H. The Moffatt New Testament Commentary: The Epistle of Paul to the Romans.
London: Hodder and Stoughton Limited, 1960.

Dunn, James D.G.. Word Biblical Commentary: Volume 38: Romans 1-8. Dallas: Word
Books, Publisher, 1988.

Fung, Ronald Y.K. A Commentary on the Epistles to the Romans (1). Taipei: Campus
Evangelical Fellowship, 1997.

Harrison, Everett F. Expositor’s Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing
House, 1976.

Hawthorne, Gerald F. & Ralph P. Martin, Eds., Dictionary Of Paul And His Letters. Taipei:
Campus Evangelical Fellowship, 2009.

Hendriksen, William. New Testament Commentary: Romans. Grand Rapids: Baker
Academic, 2007.


Kasemann, Ernest. Commentary on Romans. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans
Publishing Company, 1980.

Matera, Frank J. Commentaries on the New Testaments. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic,
2010.

Mills, Sanford C. A Hebrew Christian Looks at Romans. Grand Rapids: Dunham
Publishing Company, 1969.

Morris, Leon. The Epistle to the Romans. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing
Company, 1988.

Murray, John. The New International Commentary on the NT: The Epistle to the Romans.
Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1979.

Osborne, Grant R. The IVP New Testament Commentary Series: Romans. Downers Grove:
Inter-Varsity Press, 2004.

Robertson, Archibald T. Living Spring Greek New Testament Exegetical Notes: Volume V:
Romans. Monterey Park: Living Spring Publications, 1999.

Schreiner, Thomas R. Romans: Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament.
Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2000.

Stifler, James M. The Epistle to the Romans. Chicago: Moody Press, 1960.

Stott, John. the Message of Romans. Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 1994.

Thomas, W.H. Griffith. St Paul’s Epistle to the Romans. Taipei: Logos Publishing House,
2003.

Vine, W. E., Merrill E. Unger & William White, Jr., Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary.
Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1996.

Wiersbe , Warren W. Be Right. Wheaton: Victor Books, 1987.

Wuest, Kenneth S. Wuest’ Word Studies. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing
Company, 1971.


[1] William Barclay, The Daily Study Bible: The Letter to the Romans, Translator: Dr Timothy Chow (Hong Kong: Chinese Christian Literature Council Ltd), 55.
[2] Warren W. Wiersbe, Be Right (Wheaton: Victor Books, 1987), 25-29.
[3] C.E.B. Cranfield, Romans: A Shorter Commentary (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1992), xi.
[4] Brendan Byrne, S.J., Sacra Pagina Series 6: Romans (Collegeville: Liturgical Press, 2007), 10.
[5] F.F. Bruce, Romans (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2002), 88.
[6] Barclay, The Daily Study Bible: The Letter to the Romans, 63-64.
[7] Byrne, Sacra Pagina Series 6: Romans, 102.
[8] W. E. Vine, Merrill E. Unger & William White, Jr., Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1996), 35.
[9] Leon Morris, The Epistle to the Romans (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1988), 139.
[10] Ibid, 102.
[11] Clinton E. Arnold, Zondervan Illustrated Bible Backgrounds Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2002), 18.
[12] Ronald Y.K Fung, A Commentary on the Epistles to the Romans (1) (Taipei: Campus Evangelical Fellowship, 1997), 406.
[13] Sanford C. Mills, A Hebrew Christian Looks at Romans (Grand Rapids: Dunham Publishing Company, 1969), 62.
[14] Grant R. Osborne, The IVP New Testament Commentary Series: Romans (Downers Grove: Inter-Varsity Press, 2004)
[15] Thomas R. Schreiner, Romans: Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2000), 137.
[16] John Stott, the Message of Romans (Leicester: Inter-Varsity Press, 1994), 92.
[17] C. Mills, A Hebrew Christian Looks at Romans, 74.
[18] Morris, The Epistle to the Romans, 143.
[19] Gerald F. Hawthorne & Ralph P. Martin, Eds., Dictionary Of Paul And His Letters (Taipei: Campus Evangelical Fellowship, 2009), 774-775.
[20] C), 418.
[21] Frank J. Matera, Commentaries on the New Testaments (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2010), 72.
[22] Osborne, The IVP New Testament Commentary Series: Romans,76.
[23] Ernest Kasemann, Commentary on Romans (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1980), 73.
[24] Everett F. Harrison, Expositor’s Bible Commentary (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1976), 34.
[25] C.H. Dodd, The Moffatt New Testament Commentary: The Epistle of Paul to the Romans (London: Hodder and Stoughton Limited, 1960), 39.
[26] Cranfield, Romans: A Shorter Commentary, 58.
[27] Archibald T. Robertson, Living Spring Greek New Testament Exegetical Notes: Volume V: Romans (Monterey Park: Living Spring Publications, 1999), 80. 
[28] Bruce, Romans, 83.
[29] Matera, Commentaries on the New Testament, 71.
[30] Bruce, Romans, 83.
[31] Barclay, The Daily Study Bible: The Letter to the Romans, 55.
[32] Stott, The Message of Romans, 94.
[33] Vine, Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary, 334.
[34] Ronald, A Commentary on the Epistles to the Romans (1) , 389.
[35] Kenneth S. Wuest, Wuest’ Word Studies (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1971), 46.
[36] Osborne, The IVP New Testament Commentary Series: Romans, 72.
[37] Kenneth S. Wuest, Wuest’ Word Studies, 51.
[38] William Hendriksen, New Testament Commentary: Romans (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007), 108.
[39] Barclay, The Daily Study Bible: The Letter to the Romans, 62.

Tuesday, 16 October 2012

Summary on Islamic & Unification Faith

(Oct 2012: 'Religions & Cults: Summary Paper)

I.         RELIGION: ISLAM
1.      THE FOUNDER AND ISLAMIC HISTORY
Islam is a religion founded by Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of God be on him) within the period of his lifetime (approximately A.D. 560-632) when he claimed to receive revelation (“wahi”) from Gabriel the archangel of God at the age of 40, in Makka (Mecca) of Arabia, which was the traditional center of trade and religion, and the commercial crossroad between east and west, and north and south regions.
Muhammad was recognized by his followers to be the Last Prophet and the Messenger of Allah sent during the “jahiliyya” (period of ignorance or “The Dark Age”), where majority of Arabian regions were populated with idol worshippers. He was the first “Muslim” who pointed others toward the Path, who sealed the revelation of Allah, written and known as Al-Qur’an.
Upon receiving of the revelation, Muhammad tried to persuade his kinsmen to return to worship of the One True God (the God worshipped by Abraham), but he was severely persecuted by pagan Arabians. With a handful converts, Muhammad began the Hijrah in A.D. 622, migrated themselves to Yathrib and built his first masjid there. The conquests of Makka and al-Ta’if established his fame over Arabia. Apart from demolishing idols of these two places, he had received homage from different people groups and tribes. In Yathrib (Medina) he fused the Arabian Muslims under Islamic social and political structures and customs, guided them under the Islamic teachings and built a new Islamic nation or “ummah” (community).
Mohammad married a rich widow Khadijah at his age of 25 and she became his first follower. He remained monogamous until the age of 50 when Khadijah died, since then he became polygamy. He died with fever and was buried in Yathrib, and was succeeded by Abu Bakr as Caliph. Shortly after Muhammad’s death, his successors and followers have propagated and spread the Muslim faith even over the boundaries of Arabia.     
2.      ISLAMIC BELIEFS
The root word of Islam in Arabic is SLM which means peace, and “aslama” derives from it denoting to act of submission or resignation to God. It is believed by Muslims (or Moslem, which means “one who submits to God) to be the only true religion professed by prophets Allah of all generations since the day of Adam. For Muslims, peace is received through submission of oneself under the will of Allah.
A true Muslim must possess three basic elements consist of faith, action and realization. He has to profess his faith acknowledging Allah as the Creator, and submit himself as servant under the Will of the Master. He is to believe Muhammad as the Prophet of Allah, and the Al-Qur’an as heavenly revelation to men guiding them towards worship of Allah, and Sunnah (practices of Muhammad) as exemplary values of their actions and words in practical living. He must be ready to give up everything for the sake of Allah, even his own life, which is commonly known as Jihad (means striving and struggling in the Path of God). He is to believe of life-after-death and his own responsibility to be accountable to Allah in the Day of Judgment based on his freewill in choosing how to live his life on earth.
The Shari’ah is external rules and laws laid down for proper and wholistic Muslim conduct in all perspectives of human living. Worship in Islam is related to one’s purification of soul and practical daily living. Muslims believe the message of Islam is for the entire human race and Allah is God for all peoples. Therefore their social mission is to expand Kingdom on earth and to spread the Islamic faith through practical political or commercial approaches. They also recognize the ownership of Allah over all their possessions and are able to share with the poor. The five pillars of Islamic structure observed by Muslims are Islamic Creed (Shahada, faith in unity of God), Prayer(salat, 5 times a day), Fasting(sawn, one month during Ramandan), almsgiving(Zakāt, sharing with the poor) and pilgrimage to Mecca (Hajj, at least once per lifetime).        
II.      CULT: UNIFICATION CHURCH
1.      THE FOUNDER
The founder of the Unification Church(UC), Sun Myung Moon, was born on January 6, 1920 into a North Korean farmer family. He had accessed Christianity and became a Sunday School teacher since young as his parents were devout Presbyterians. Under the cruelty and ruling age of Japan over North Korea he grew with a strong sense of nationality and injustice.
Sun Myung Moon claimed that at his age of 16, Jesus had appeared to him in a vision on the Easter Morning while he was praying on the mountains, and entrusted him with a mission to continue His unfinished work. Thus he was recognized as the Messiah who will establish God’s kingdom and world peace on earth. He had been imprisoned six times under Japanese, North Korean, South Korean and US governments for the sake of his calling and mission.
He married his second wife Hak Ja Han Moon, who strived to be his great helper in ministry throughout his lifetime, and they were honored as the True Parents of mankind who had replaced the original roles of Adam and Eve, bearing fourteen True Children during their marriage who are considered to be sinless.
2.      THE VISION AND MISSION
UC seeks to pursue the dream of God in establishing peace and harmony in societies all over the world, and in building true love of God among the families. The headquarter is built in New York during 1976, known as “Heaven’s Blessing Palace” and it functions as a temple to the world peace, creating ministries to develop ideal families, and enhancing cooperation and harmony among religious groups.   
3.      THE TEACHING AND CORE BELIEFS
The Divine Principle was systemized in 1945 and published in 1966. It serves as the main theological textbook to its believers. The teachings are arranged systematically stating God’s purpose of creating mankind, the fall of man and the redemptive process of God in history restoring mankind to Himself. The followers of UC believe in God, in Jesus as Messiah and Bible as the Holy Scripture.
The Second Coming of Christ is taught to be in this age, in the flesh of Sun Myung Moon who is married to His Bride in the flesh of Hak Ja Han. They are the True Parents and are confessed as Eternal King and Queen of Peace, liberators of God’s heart who offer salvation, future blessings of true love, forgiveness and happiness for their followers. UC believes that this materialistic age will soon be replaced by a spiritual age with universal sacrificial love and harmony dwelt among the mankind.  .
2.4  THE MOVEMENT AND ITS MINISTRIES
The first UC was built in the refugee city of Pusan in South Korea in 1950 and Moon prophesized since then that the Divine Principle will be preached all over the world. UC has majored its efforts in promoting world peace activities through sending missionaries to build churches in many nations, with the True Parents travelling extensively around the world giving their speeches. They also associated with some major world political bodies.
UC has founded organizations to work against communism, to promote world peace and to reconcile interreligious conflicts etc. The Unification Theological Seminary was founded in New York and The Washington Times was launched and grew to be the second largest daily newspaper in the US capital. One of the most striking phenomena found in the UC is the international mass wedding ceremonial blessings conducted by Moon.
After the departure of the founder Sun Myung Moon on September 3, 2012, the peace of UC has been disrupted by some negative marital news discovered among the Moon’s family members and there are disunity issues found also among its top leaders.   

Monday, 8 October 2012

修道主义与其发展


(Sept 2012:教会历史综观:《透视两千年》阅读报告》


修道主义与其发展

修道主义与《新约》提到的苦修主义有些相似处。当代的人要修行,就会采取如禁食,祷告和克制享乐活动(如禁欲,独居)等方式纪律己身,以达圣洁的效果。其后三百年间,各样修道活动也进行着。然而,浓烈的修道色彩真正始于主后四百年,弥漫着整个早期与中古时期的教会与欧洲大陆,活跃期横跨超过漫长的一千年(约至主后一千五百年)之久。

罗马帝国的君士坦丁大帝战胜就位后,对基督教采取宽容和拥护的态度,甚至亲自上教会礼拜,使帝国上下的朝野臣民对教会都趋之若鹜。教会人数激增,整体上却变得世俗化,且失去单纯的信仰价值。进教会的人,有者不但没有抱持为主舍身的坚信精神,反倒要借助教会的优势得着政治或私人的利益。教会的领导权时而落入那些没有真实信仰且动机不良的人手中,异教信徒也把一些之前膜拜的偶像与迷信成分融入教会的敬拜,使当时教会内部的信仰生活彻底变质。教会变得仪式化,缺乏属灵生命力。因此,一些想要追求内心平安和虔诚信仰的人就开始渴望脱离教会的框架,去寻求真信仰的生活。修道主义便成为当时最崇高理想的信仰生活方式。

修道主义最先在帝国东部流行起来,主要是因为希腊教会处身罗马帝国东边的政治要城君士坦丁堡,教会内的腐败受到政治直接的影响而加剧。信徒走出教会后,就在埃及一带的旷野和阿拉伯沙漠附近进行个人的修行生涯。第一所东方修道团约于公元320年成立,由帕科缪在埃及尼罗河附近的塔本尼亚创建。

东方教父亚他拿修因为支持尼西亚信经,反对亚流主义而遭到支持亚流派的东罗马掌权者逼迫。他多次往西避难于罗马,把帝国东部希腊教会正流行着的修道概念与他偏爱的安东尼修士的故事带入西方拉丁教会。然而,地理环境的限制无法促进个人式的修行,所以西方的修道方式多以团体进行。到了中古时期,欧洲出现几千所富有规模组织的修道院,修道气氛浓厚,遍布欧洲大陆。人们对修道士的崇敬与信任,胜于当时的罗马教皇。

修道主义在罗马帝国盛行,除了教会生活的腐化促使人心寻求改变外,也有赖于当代富有影响力的主教如安波罗修和奥古斯丁大力的倡导及落实,以及教会内部的分裂(如亚他拿修与亚流派在信仰上的分歧)和政治势力对基督徒的迫害(如罗马皇帝增压多纳徒派)。有些百姓为了逃避债务或税务,也加入修道行列。修道主义在龙蛇混杂的环境下,相当有效地保全教会该有的属灵生命风貌与活力。修道院也保持中立的政治和宗教立场,成为当代抗衡教会,教皇或君王不当政策与作法的一股强劲势力,更带动欧洲在农耕,文学和神学领域的开发与进展。

前两代的修道院生活尚能保持高度严谨,之后就出现松懈现象,损害了教会的形象。一系列的改革发生在修道院的组织中,但这些改革都无法有较长远的成效。本笃会是改革中的佼佼者,在创办人本笃带动下,本笃修道院具备非常有组织性,系统性的制度。为了保存修道院的纯全,加入本笃修道院的人必须接受观察和通过试用期,且要矢志过贫苦的生活,保守贞洁的生命及绝对顺从修道院的领袖与制度。本笃修道准则被视为欧洲中古时代的修道理想模式。

修道院的生活基本上分成劳力与静修两大层面。在欧洲动荡不安的时局中,修道院主张自养自足,力求在无外来的资助下生存。修道士需亲自耕田纺织,维持修道院的清洁工作,且投身长时间规律性的祷告。欧洲局势比较稳定后,修道院减少其劳力上的活动,修道士转而花更多时间投身学术与神学的研究。

本笃会在十二世纪进入全盛期,却也日渐衰落。为了管理人数庞大的修道院,在财务上就需要作出妥协。修道院接纳王侯子弟及其捐献给修道院的田地。有些纨绔王侯子弟无心修道,把许多败坏风俗的作为带入修道院(如奢侈生活,私养女人与私生子),使修道院名声败坏。西笃会与奥古斯丁会为新近的修会,两者兴起带动改革浪潮。十六世纪的宗教改革家马丁路德就出自奥古斯丁会。

中古兴盛衰亡交替期间,出现了道明会与方济会两大修会,组织与系统有别于固定的修道院方式,适时在宗教改革中保住了天主教。道明会以旅游方式四处布道,教导和感化信众,且成为异端裁判所的主要成员,帮助处理教义的纷争。方济会创办人法兰西斯四处乞讨维生,且服务有需要的人,影响带动许多跟随者。道明会与方济会因其《圣经》的知识与敬虔的生活对教会贡献极大,也在宣教史上有着显赫的成绩。

 

 

附注:

此阅读报告以李振群博士于200010月出版的著作《透视二千年:卷一:早期教会,中古教会》为本。其出版社为马来西亚柔佛士古来的协传培训中心,全书长达298页。此报告中的“修道主义”及前后历史背景取自148-162页, 187-202页,251-258页。

修道主义的贡献与弊端

(Sept 2012: 教会历史综观- 专文:“修道主义”的贡献与弊端)

1. 简介

修道主义虽非罗马天主教独有的信仰方式,修道院的生活模式却是该教将近一千年[1]独特的信仰生活型态。若以个人苦修主义为其渊源,它实际上是与教会历史的前一千五百年并进[2],是一股左右教会动态的强势。修道主义确实有某些负面性的影响,修道院与修士甚至也卷入欧洲封建制度腐化期教皇与政廷间的纠结,整体上,它还算是教会历史上的一股信仰清流,间中为变质的教会生命注入鲜活与催化的能量。修道主义拓展出来的修道院生活与组织,及修道的理念和运用,在教会史上作出的正面贡献是不容忽视的。笔者将论述修道院的贡献与弊端,带出其优劣影响:

2. 修道主义的贡献

修道主义不论在个人的灵性修养,教会的敬拜仪式,基督教义的整顿或教廷的素质都有着极正面的贡献,并带动当代社会的农耕园艺及教育发展,对后世在基督教信仰,学术,神学和艺术上的影响极为长远。兹分析如下:

2.1 提升个人与教会整体的灵性

修道士全情投身祷告,默想,读经与禁食[3],从事农耕纺织等劳力的工作,顺服修道院规则与院长的制度,对本身的道德纪律有特定的提升。作为修道院标准的本笃修道会及后来奉行“圣本笃规条”的其他修院,要求修士坚守忠贞,贫穷与顺服的信念[4],有助他们在灵性与体力上达到基本的平衡。在教会道德生活腐败,如中世纪政治与教会黑暗的时期,修道院无疑巩固信徒灵性的生命与教会信仰的活力,促进与保存纯正的基督教理念。许多的修道院是出产伟大主教和教会领袖(如奥古斯丁,大贵格利,马丁路德等)的地方。

2.2 促进文献,神学与教育的发展

犹太教的爱色尼派曾是隐居旷野的一群,死海古卷就在他们聚居的地方被发掘出来。四世纪亚历山大的主教亚他那修在文字上也极力推崇修道主义。奥古斯丁的《上帝之城》适切地表达出当代的信仰状态。

修道院进入组织与经济上的稳定后,许多修道士开始投身学术研究,修道院附有图书馆(称为中世纪的书局),使修道院成为文化,学术与教育的中心。本尼狄克每日规定的两小时读书研究时间演变为日后学府的模式[5]。弗尔大,黎西流,圣迦伦与科尔比等中世纪的修道院都是文化与宗教中心。[6]

修士致力抄写的古代文学(拉丁散文与诗歌)手抄本,将希腊罗马的文化保存至中世纪[7]。在欧洲局势动荡不安,罗马势力衰微,蛮族外侵下,修道士被称为希罗文化的监护者。因为当时欧洲教育不普及,修士也是历史事件的记录者,帮助皇帝起草文件。修道士最大的贡献,就是用毕生精力手抄圣经本[8]

后期许多的修道会都积极投身教育,如奥古斯丁修道会及托钵修会。道明会强调教育与神学理论,成为抵御异端的一股正统势力。耶稣会尤其注重儿童教育,创办许多学院与神学院。

2.3 投身宣教与社工的大成

修道院在社会关怀与宣教上所作出的努力是有目共睹的。入侵欧洲的蛮族在修道士的感化下接触到基督教的信仰,尤其是设立在异教边疆或区域内的修道院更成为宣教的中心[9]

十二世纪的两大修会,即圣骑士团与慈善武士团,是苦修主义和武士精神的结合[10],摆脱了固有传统的修道院生活方式,为前往耶路撒冷朝圣的人提供保安与款待。慈善武士团在圣城设立医院提供医疗服务,照顾贫穷大众[11],又参与了十字军的征伐。

十三世纪兴起乞讨维生的明道会与方济会,他们被称为“传教的修士”或“修道僧”,走入贫苦疾患的人群里服务,并宣讲主的道。方济会创办人法兰西斯赤贫的信念吸引许多跟随者;道明会不仅注重教育,也在许多国家进行宣教。后来崛起的耶稣会以有力的讲道力图在欧洲建立大公主义。道明会,方济会,奥古斯丁会和耶稣会的宣教活动,使罗马天主教在十六至十七世纪的百年间不断向海外伸延,算是其中一个辉煌的宣教世纪。[12]

3. 修道主义的弊端

修道主义的弊病,主要源自修道者想要逃避俗世烦乱无章的宗教生活,寻找安宁之处静心操练自己的灵性,此厌世心理演变成“遁世”或“出世”的生活形态。另一个弊端,就是修道主义成为有组织性的团体后,其严谨而制度化的修道模式,以及被教廷套用为推进教会制度的工具[13],使它成为宗教生活腐化的温床。

3.1 遁世与神秘主义

张绥称修道主义为基督徒“对现实苦难的抗议”[14],谷勒木认为是教会有组织性的厌世倾向[15]。当基督教进入全盛罗马帝国的“国教”期,教会生活与属灵素质因大量官员与前异教士的加入而变质。虔诚的信徒对当代政治与宗教现象的无力感,使他们衍生出遁世的想法,想借今生克己的生活表达他们虔诚的信仰;又因景仰过往殉道的精神,就企图通过修道式的白色殉道[16],不流血却保有圣洁生命的形式,来展现他们对主的坚贞,期待“来世”所应许的福分。

当修道是为要与世隔绝或独善其身,就与基督教入世的教导有所出入。基督教的生活信念虽力求圣洁纯全,却也讲求作光作盐,投身人群以基督教的信仰价值影响改变世界。单单讲求灵里与神的亲近却拒绝与外界的接触,往往导致神秘经验主义的风行,夸耀属灵的智慧与超凡的神奇能力[17],如盛行一时的凯尔特修道制度。

3.2 形式主义

有些修道士生活极端(安东尼八十六年隐居,俄利根自阉等),过于拘泥形式(西门三十年柱顶修道,修士间个人修行生活的比较[18],禁欲与守独身等),似乎突出工作而忽略神的恩典。修道制度本为塑造提升信徒的灵性。然而,一旦专注在奉行绝对的形式,后人就会忽略其实质与本意,修道制度遂演变为严谨的律法主义[19]。因此修道院不断经历灵性的兴衰,导致后来多番的改革运动,如中世纪著名的克吕尼改革运动,维持了将近两百年,致力于翻新教士制度,复兴之前本笃会的修道精神。[20]

4. 结论

修道主义从起先东方教会中人“出世”修行的一种平民运动,到传入西方教会,经过中世纪“入世”的状态,其中涉及了贵族田产与政教的抗衡,到后期蓬勃的“济世”宣教阶段,当中的转变是巨大的,却仍不失为千年以来动荡起伏的历史潮流中基督信仰的中坚分子。修道的精神仍然以保存正统纯正的教义,持守圣洁的属灵生命及宣扬基督的救赎洪恩为主线。它是教会历史局部却影响深远的部分,不但被以后的教会采纳为退修会,静修营的参考版本,也影响其他宗教(如回教)的修道形式。

 

书目参照

陶理博士。基督教二千年史:自第一世纪至当代。译者:李伯明,林牧野。香港
     九龙:海天书楼,1997

李振群。透视二千年:卷一早期教会,中古教会。士古来:协传培训中心,2000

谷勒木。教会历史。译者:李少兰。香港九龙:道声出版社,1996

梁家麟。基督教会史略。明风出版社:1999。(电子书)

比尔。奥斯汀。基督教发展史。译者:许建人,马杰伟。香港九龙:种籽出版社
     有限公司,1991

McManners, John牛津基督教史。译者:张景龙。香港:贵州人民出版社,1996

培克尔。基督教史略。译者:萧维元。香港九龙:浸信会出版部,1991

张绥。基督教会史。上海:三联书局,1992

Gasquet, Francis Aidan. English Monastic Life. 1904.(e-book)

祁伯尔。历史的轨迹:二千年教会史。译者:李林静芝。校园书房出版社,1986
       (电子书)



[1] 东方教会团体式的修道院始于公元320年,由帕科缪发起。修道院就建立在埃及尼罗河附近塔本尼亚,后来由因受逼迫的主教亚他那修避难罗马而将修道主义与修道院的概念引进西方教会。十三世纪的修道士开始走出修道院固定的生活模式。
[2] 《圣经》的《新约》一开始就提到一些与罗马东方教会相似的苦修行为,如施洗约翰在旷野朴实的生活与传道。十六世纪兴起的宗教改革也让罗马天主教的修道主义日趋没落。
[3] 陶理博士,《基督教二千年史:自第一世纪至当代》,译者:李伯明,林牧野(香港九龙:海天书楼,1997),214
[4] 李振群,《透视二千年:卷一早期教会,中古教会》(士古来:协传培训中心,2000),197
[5] 谷勒木,《教会历史》,译者:李少兰(香港九龙:道声出版社,1996),177205
[6] 陶理博士,《基督教二千年史:自第一世纪至当代》,307
[7] 同上,217308
[8] 梁家麟,《基督教会史略》(明风出版社:1999),电子书第四章26-27
[9] 谷勒木,《教会历史》,205
[10] 比尔。奥斯汀,《基督教发展史》,译者:许建人,马杰伟(香港九龙:种籽出版社有限公司,1991),187
[11] John McManners,《牛津基督教史》,译者:张景龙(香港:贵州人民出版社,1996),175
[12] 比尔。奥斯汀,《基督教发展史》,324
[13] 培克尔,《基督教史略》,译者:萧维元(香港九龙:浸信会出版部,1991),107
[14] 张绥,《基督教会史》(上海:三联书局,1992),130
[15] 谷勒木,《教会历史》,142
[16] 梁家麟,《基督教会史略》,电子书第四章,5
[17] 同上,4
[18] Francis Aidan GasquetEnglish Monastic Lifee-book:1904.
[19] 梁家麟,《基督教会史略》,电子书第四章,18
[20] 比尔。奥斯汀,《基督教发展史》,179